Abstract
Microbial aerosols are generated during dental treatments and may represent an important source of infection. This study was designed to quantify bacterial air contamination during dental treatments in both a closed dental operatory and a multichair dental clinic. Air was sampled by using a slit type of biological air sampler. Following air sampling, blood-supplemented Trypticase soy agar plates were incubated at 37 degrees C under anaerobic conditions for 7 days. The maximum levels of air contamination in the closed dental operatory were observed while dental treatments were being performed (four trials; 216 +/- 75 CFU/m3 for ultrasonic scaling treatments and 75 +/- 22 CFU/m3 for operative treatments). At 2 h after completion of the treatments, the bacterial counts were about the same as the pretreatment levels (12 to 14 CFU/m3). In the second part of the study, a multichair dental clinic was divided into four areas, and air contamination was monitored at each site. Three sites were located in active dental treatment areas, whereas no dental treatments were performed within an 11-m radius of the fourth site. At 3 h after the beginning of dental treatments, the highest bacterial counts were obtained in the three active dental treatment areas (76 to 114 CFU/m3). However, there was noticeable contamination in the inactive dental treatment area (42 CFU/m3). Thus, bacterial aerosols were able to spread into areas where there was no dental activity. My data show that dental treatments significantly increased the levels of bacterial air contamination in both a closed dental operatory and a multichair dental clinic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (347.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burge H. A. Risks associated with indoor infectious aerosols. Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 Mar;6(2):263–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fine D. H., Mendieta C., Barnett M. L., Furgang D., Meyers R., Olshan A., Vincent J. Efficacy of preprocedural rinsing with an antiseptic in reducing viable bacteria in dental aerosols. J Periodontol. 1992 Oct;63(10):821–824. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.10.821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Infection control in the dental office: a realistic approach. J Am Dent Assoc. 1986 Apr;112(4):458–468. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu D. P., Zambito R. F. Aerosols and cross infection in dental practice--a historic view. Gen Dent. 1981 Mar-Apr;29(2):136–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Micik R. E., Miller R. L., Mazzarella M. A., Ryge G. Studies on dental aerobiology. I. Bacterial aerosols generated during dental procedures. J Dent Res. 1969 Jan-Feb;48(1):49–56. doi: 10.1177/00220345690480012401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Molinari J. A., Merchant V. A., Gleason M. J. Controversies in infection control. Dent Clin North Am. 1990 Jan;34(1):55–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagniano R. P., Scheid R. C., Rosen S., Beck F. M. Airborne microorganisms collected in a preclinical dental laboratory. J Dent Educ. 1985 Sep;49(9):653–655. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Runnells R. R. An overview of infection control in dental practice. J Prosthet Dent. 1988 May;59(5):625–629. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90083-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walter C. W. Prevention and control of airborne infection in hospitals. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;353:312–330. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb18935.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams J. F., Johnston A. M., Johnson B., Huntington M. K., Mackenzie C. D. Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines: prevalence, intensity and microbiological characteristics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 Oct;124(10):59–65. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]