Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):28. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.28

Why are children referred for circumcision?

N Williams 1, J Chell 1, L Kapila 1
PMCID: PMC1676352  PMID: 8435573

Full text

PDF

Page 28

28

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Escala J. M., Rickwood A. M. Balanitis. Br J Urol. 1989 Feb;63(2):196–197. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. GAIRDNER D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MacKinlay G. A. Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic. BMJ. 1988 Sep 3;297(6648):590–591. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6648.590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rickwood A. M., Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1989 Sep;71(5):275–277. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES