Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):102–107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.102

Evaluation of two school smoking education programmes under normal classroom conditions.

D Nutbeam 1, P Macaskill 1, C Smith 1, J M Simpson 1, J Catford 1
PMCID: PMC1676653  PMID: 8435601

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To assess the effectiveness of two school based smoking education projects in delaying onset of smoking behaviour and in improving health knowledge, beliefs, and values. DESIGN--Cluster randomised controlled trial of two projects taught under normal classroom conditions. Schools were allocated to one of four groups to receive the family smoking education project (FSE); the smoking and me project (SAM); both projects in sequence (FSE/SAM); or no intervention at all. SETTING--39 schools in Wales and England matched for size and catchment profile. SUBJECTS--All first year pupils in the schools were included and were assessed on three occasions (4538 before teaching (1988), 3930 immediately after teaching (1989), 3786 at one year follow up (1990)). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Self reported smoking behaviour (backed by saliva sample) and change in relevant health knowledge, beliefs, and values. RESULTS--No consistent significant differences in smoking behaviour, health knowledge, beliefs, or values were found between the four groups. For never smokers at baseline the rate of remaining never smokers in 1990 was 74% (594/804) in the control group, 65% (455/704) in the FSE group, 70% (440/625) in the SAM group, and 69% (549/791) in the FSE/SAM group (chi 2adj = 6.1, df = 3, p = 0.1). Knowledge about effects of smoking rose in all groups from a mean score of 5.4 in 1988 to 6.4 in 1989 and 6.5 in 1990. CONCLUSIONS--More comprehensive interventions than school health education alone will be needed to reduce teenage smoking. Other measures including further restrictions on access to cigarettes and on the promotion of tobacco products need to be considered. Further research will be needed to develop effective school based health education projects, which should be formally field tested under normal conditions before widespread dissemination.

Full text

PDF
102

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aarø L. E., Bruland E., Hauknes A., Løchsen P. M. Smoking among Norwegian schoolchildren 1975-1980. III. The effect of anti-smoking campaigns. Scand J Psychol. 1983;24(4):277–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1983.tb00501.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bewley B. R., Johnson M. R., Bland J. M., Murray M. Trends in children's smoking. Community Med. 1980 Aug;2(3):186–189. doi: 10.1007/BF02549021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Botvin G. J., Eng A., Williams C. L. Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking through life skills training. Prev Med. 1980 Jan;9(1):135–143. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(80)90064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Effectiveness of a health education curriculum for secondary school students--United States, 1986-1989. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1991 Feb 22;40(7):113–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donald A., Donner A. Adjustments to the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square statistic and odds ratio variance estimator when the data are clustered. Stat Med. 1987 Jun;6(4):491–499. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flay B. R., Koepke D., Thomson S. J., Santi S., Best J. A., Brown K. S. Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial. Am J Public Health. 1989 Oct;79(10):1371–1376. doi: 10.2105/ajph.79.10.1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Glynn T. J. Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs. J Sch Health. 1989 May;59(5):181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1989.tb04698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kishchuk N., O'Loughlin J., Paradis S., Masson P., Sacks-Silver G. Illuminating negative results in evaluation of smoking prevention programs. J Sch Health. 1990 Nov;60(9):448–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1990.tb05973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Males M. Youth behavior: subcultural effect or mirror of adult behavior? J Sch Health. 1990 Dec;60(10):505–508. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1990.tb05891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McKennell A. C. Bias in the reported incidence of smoking by children. Int J Epidemiol. 1980 Jun;9(2):167–177. doi: 10.1093/ije/9.2.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murray D. M., Pirie P., Leupker R. V., Pallonen U. Five- and six-year follow-up results from four seventh-grade smoking prevention strategies. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):207–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00846551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rawbone R. G., Guz A. Cigarette smoking among secondary schoolchildren 1975-79. Arch Dis Child. 1982 May;57(5):352–358. doi: 10.1136/adc.57.5.352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tell G. S., Klepp K. I., Vellar O. D., McAlister A. Preventing the onset of cigarette smoking in Norwegian adolescents: the Oslo youth study. Prev Med. 1984 May;13(3):256–275. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(84)90083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson E. L. Smoking education programs 1960-1976. Am J Public Health. 1978 Mar;68(3):250–257. doi: 10.2105/ajph.68.3.250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vartiainen E., Pallonen U., McAlister A., Koskela K., Puska P. Effect of two years of educational intervention on adolescent smoking (the North Karelia Youth Project). Bull World Health Organ. 1983;61(3):529–532. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES