Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Nov;61(11):3836–3842. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.11.3836-3842.1995

Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA delta-endotoxins in a laboratory-selected Heliothis virescens strain is related to receptor alteration.

M K Lee 1, F Rajamohan 1, F Gould 1, D H Dean 1
PMCID: PMC167687  PMID: 8526494

Abstract

The Bacillus thuringiensis toxin-binding properties of midgut epithelial cells from two strains of Heliothis virescens were compared. One H. virescens strains (YHD2) which was selected against CryIAc toxin had over 10,000-fold resistance to CryIAc toxin relative to the susceptible strain and was cross-resistant to CryIAa and CryIAb. The second H. virescens strain (YDK) was susceptible to these toxins in the order CryIAc > CryIAb > CryIAa. Receptor-binding properties of CryIAa, CryIAb, and CryIAc toxins were compared between the susceptible and resistant strains. Saturation and competition-binding experiments were performed with brush border membrane vesicles prepared from midguts of the susceptible and resistant insects and 125I-labeled toxins. In the susceptible strain, saturable, specific, and high-affinity binding of all three toxins was observed. The relative binding-site concentration was directly correlated with toxicity (CryIAc > CryIAb > CryIAa). In the resistant strains, the binding affinities of CryIAb and CryIAc were similar to that observed with the susceptible strain and ony minor differences in binding-site concentration (Bmax) were observed. The major difference between the two strains was the total lack of binding of CryIAa toxin to the brush border membrane vesicles of the resistant strain. Heterologous competition-binding experiments and ligand blot analysis supported the hypothesis that there were multiple binding sites for the toxins. On the basis of results of the present study, we propose that alterations in binding proteins shared by all three toxins are a major factor in resistance. This suggests that not all receptors of CryIAc might be involved in toxic function.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (431.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ferré J., Real M. D., Van Rie J., Jansens S., Peferoen M. Resistance to the Bacillus thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field population of Plutella xylostella is due to a change in a midgut membrane receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 15;88(12):5119–5123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garczynski S. F., Crim J. W., Adang M. J. Identification of putative insect brush border membrane-binding molecules specific to Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin by protein blot analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Oct;57(10):2816–2820. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.10.2816-2820.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gould F., Martinez-Ramirez A., Anderson A., Ferre J., Silva F. J., Moar W. J. Broad-spectrum resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in Heliothis virescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7986–7990. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hofmann C., Lüthy P., Hütter R., Pliska V. Binding of the delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis to brush-border membrane vesicles of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Eur J Biochem. 1988 Apr 5;173(1):85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Knowles B. H., Blatt M. R., Tester M., Horsnell J. M., Carroll J., Menestrina G., Ellar D. J. A cytolytic delta-endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis forms cation-selective channels in planar lipid bilayers. FEBS Lett. 1989 Feb 27;244(2):259–262. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(89)80540-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee M. K., Milne R. E., Ge A. Z., Dean D. H. Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 15;267(5):3115–3121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. MacIntosh S. C., Stone T. B., Jokerst R. S., Fuchs R. L. Binding of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins to a laboratory-selected line of Heliothis virescens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Oct 15;88(20):8930–8933. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McGaughey W. H. Insect Resistance to the Biological Insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science. 1985 Jul 12;229(4709):193–195. doi: 10.1126/science.229.4709.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Munson P. J., Rodbard D. Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. Anal Biochem. 1980 Sep 1;107(1):220–239. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(80)90515-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Oddou P., Hartmann H., Geiser M. Identification and characterization of Heliothis virescens midgut membrane proteins binding Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Dec 5;202(2):673–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Oppert B., Kramer K. J., Johnson D. E., MacIntosh S. C., McGaughey W. H. Altered protoxin activation by midgut enzymes from a Bacillus thuringiensis resistant strain of Plodia interpunctella. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Feb 15;198(3):940–947. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tabashnik B. E., Finson N., Johnson M. W., Moar W. J. Resistance to Toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Causes Minimal Cross-Resistance to B. thuringiensis subsp. aizawai in the Diamondback Moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 May;59(5):1332–1335. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.5.1332-1335.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Van Rie J., Jansens S., Höfte H., Degheele D., Van Mellaert H. Receptors on the brush border membrane of the insect midgut as determinants of the specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1378–1385. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1378-1385.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Van Rie J., Jansens S., Höfte H., Degheele D., Van Mellaert H. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Dec 8;186(1-2):239–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Rie J., McGaughey W. H., Johnson D. E., Barnett B. D., Van Mellaert H. Mechanism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science. 1990 Jan 5;247(4938):72–74. doi: 10.1126/science.2294593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Whiteley H. R., Schnepf H. E. The molecular biology of parasporal crystal body formation in Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:549–576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.003001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wolfersberger M. G. The toxicity of two Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins to gypsy moth larvae is inversely related to the affinity of binding sites on midgut brush border membranes for the toxins. Experientia. 1990 May 15;46(5):475–477. doi: 10.1007/BF01954236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES