Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Dec;61(12):4251–4257. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4251-4257.1995

Yeast succession in the Amazon fruit Parahancornia amapa as resource partitioning among Drosophila spp.

P B Morais 1, M B Martins 1, L B Klaczko 1, L C Mendonça-Hagler 1, A N Hagler 1
PMCID: PMC167736  PMID: 8534092

Abstract

The succession of yeasts colonizing the fallen ripe amapa fruit, from Parahancornia amapa, was examined. The occupation of the substrate depended on both the competitive interactions of yeast species, such as the production of killer toxins, and the selective dispersion by the drosophilid guild of the amapa fruit. The yeast community associated with this Amazon fruit differed from those isolated from other fruits in the same forest. The physiological profile of these yeasts was mostly restricted to the assimilation of a few simple carbon sources, mainly L-sorbose, D-glycerol, DL-lactate, cellobiose, and salicin. Common fruit-associated yeasts of the genera Kloeckera and Hanseniaspora, Candida guilliermondii, and Candida krusei colonized fruits during the first three days after the fruit fell. These yeasts were dispersed and served as food for the invader Drosophila malerkotliana. The resident flies of the Drosophila willistoni group fed selectively on patches of yeasts colonizing fruits 3 to 10 days after the fruit fell. The killer toxin-producing yeasts Pichia kluyveri var. kluyveri and Candida fructus were probably involved in the exclusion of some species during the intermediate stages of fruit deterioration. An increase in pH, inhibiting toxin activity and the depletion of simple sugars, may have promoted an increase in yeast diversity in the later stages of decomposition. The yeast succession provided a patchy environment for the drosophilids sharing this ephemeral substrate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (227.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Foster J. L., Fogleman J. C. Bacterial succession in necrotic tissue of agria cactus (Stenocereus gummosus). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Feb;60(2):619–625. doi: 10.1128/aem.60.2.619-625.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. González A. E., Martínez A. T., Almendros G., Grinbergs J. A study of yeasts during the delignification and fungal transformation of wood into cattle feed in Chilean rain forest. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1989 Mar;55(3):221–236. doi: 10.1007/BF00393851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Miller M. W., Phaff H. J. Successive Microbial Populations in Calimyrna Figs. Appl Microbiol. 1962 Sep;10(5):394–400. doi: 10.1128/am.10.5.394-400.1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morais P. B., Hagler A. N., Rosa C. A., Mendonca-Hagler L. C., Klaczko L. B. Yeasts associated with Drosophila in tropical forests of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Can J Microbiol. 1992 Nov;38(11):1150–1155. doi: 10.1139/m92-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Morais P. B., Rosa C. A., Hagler A. N., Mendonca-Hagler L. C. Yeast communities of the cactus Pilosocereus arrabidae as resources for larval and adult stages of Drosophila serido. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994;66(4):313–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00882766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Starmer W. T., Ganter P. F., Aberdeen V. Geographic distribution and genetics of killer phenotypes for the yeast Pichia kluyveri across the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Mar;58(3):990–997. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.3.990-997.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Starmer W. T., Ganter P. F., Aberdeen V., Lachance M. A., Phaff H. J. The ecological role of killer yeasts in natural communities of yeasts. Can J Microbiol. 1987 Sep;33(9):783–796. doi: 10.1139/m87-134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES