Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1995 Dec;61(12):4436–4440. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4436-4440.1995

Natural assemblages of marine bacteria exhibiting high-speed motility and large accelerations.

J G Mitchell 1, L Pearson 1, S Dillon 1, K Kantalis 1
PMCID: PMC167751  PMID: 8534107

Abstract

Natural communities of marine bacteria, an isolate (FMB-Bf3) from one marine community, and Escherichia coli were examined by video microscopy for the magnitude and uniformity of their speed. Natural communities formed tight microswarms that showed higher speeds (mean = 230 microns s-1) than did E. coli (15 microns s-1) or FMB-Bf3 (mean = 62 microns s-1). Outside the microswarms, the marine bacteria slowed to 45 microns s-1. Between turns, in mid run, and while travelling in straight lines, the natural-community bacteria accelerated up to 1,450 microns s-2 while the cultured bacteria showed maximum accelerations of 70 and 166 microns s-2. The frequency distribution of speed change for the marine bacteria was skewed towards a few large negative accelerations and a range of positive accelerations. The general pattern was one of relatively slow increases in speed followed by abrupt declines. The results indicate that the mechanical generation and energetic maintenance, as well as the environmental function, of bacterial motility need reappraisal. We conclude that the standard bacterial motility parameters of low and uniform speed, derived from culture-based studies, are not necessarily applicable to marine bacterial communities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berg H. C., Brown D. A. Chemotaxis in Escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature. 1972 Oct 27;239(5374):500–504. doi: 10.1038/239500a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berg H. C. Chemotaxis in bacteria. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1975;4(00):119–136. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.04.060175.001003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg H. C., Purcell E. M. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J. 1977 Nov;20(2):193–219. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85544-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eisenbach M., Wolf A., Welch M., Caplan S. R., Lapidus I. R., Macnab R. M., Aloni H., Asher O. Pausing, switching and speed fluctuation of the bacterial flagellar motor and their relation to motility and chemotaxis. J Mol Biol. 1990 Feb 5;211(3):551–563. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90265-N. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferguson R. L., Buckley E. N., Palumbo A. V. Response of marine bacterioplankton to differential filtration and confinement. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Jan;47(1):49–55. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.1.49-55.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frymier P. D., Ford R. M., Berg H. C., Cummings P. T. Three-dimensional tracking of motile bacteria near a solid planar surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 20;92(13):6195–6199. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.13.6195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kudo S., Magariyama Y., Aizawa S. Abrupt changes in flagellar rotation observed by laser dark-field microscopy. Nature. 1990 Aug 16;346(6285):677–680. doi: 10.1038/346677a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee S., Fuhrman J. A. Relationships between Biovolume and Biomass of Naturally Derived Marine Bacterioplankton. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jun;53(6):1298–1303. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1298-1303.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Macnab R. M., Koshland D. E., Jr The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Sep;69(9):2509–2512. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.9.2509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Magariyama Y., Sugiyama S., Muramoto K., Maekawa Y., Kawagishi I., Imae Y., Kudo S. Very fast flagellar rotation. Nature. 1994 Oct 27;371(6500):752–752. doi: 10.1038/371752b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Malmcrona-Friberg K., Goodman A., Kjelleberg S. Chemotactic Responses of Marine Vibrio sp. Strain S14 (CCUG 15956) to Low-Molecular-Weight Substances under Starvation and Recovery Conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Dec;56(12):3699–3704. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.12.3699-3704.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Meister M., Lowe G., Berg H. C. The proton flux through the bacterial flagellar motor. Cell. 1987 Jun 5;49(5):643–650. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90540-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell J. G., Martinez-Alonso M., Lalucat J., Esteve I., Brown S. Velocity changes, long runs, and reversals in the Chromatium minus swimming response. J Bacteriol. 1991 Feb;173(3):997–1003. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.3.997-1003.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mitchell J. G., Pearson L., Bonazinga A., Dillon S., Khouri H., Paxinos R. Long lag times and high velocities in the motility of natural assemblages of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Mar;61(3):877–882. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.3.877-882.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Segall J. E., Manson M. D., Berg H. C. Signal processing times in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature. 1982 Apr 29;296(5860):855–857. doi: 10.1038/296855a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES