Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1993 Jun 19;306(6893):1672–1675. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1672

Prescriptions for medical research II--Is medical research well served by peer review?

R Gillett 1
PMCID: PMC1678085  PMID: 8324442

Full text

PDF
1672

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Can research benefits be proved? Nature. 1992 Sep 17;359(6392):173–174. doi: 10.1038/359173a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cole S., Cole J. R., Simon G. A. Chance and consensus in peer review. Science. 1981 Nov 20;214(4523):881–886. doi: 10.1126/science.7302566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gillett R., Harrow J. Prescriptions for medical research. I--Management within the Medical Research Council. BMJ. 1993 Jun 19;306(6893):1668–1672. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6893.1668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lock S. Fraud in medicine. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb 6;296(6619):376–377. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6619.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maddox J. Conflicts of interest declared. Nature. 1992 Nov 19;360(6401):205–205. doi: 10.1038/360205a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith R. Peering into the bowels of the MRC. I: Setting priorities. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Feb 13;296(6620):484–488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6620.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES