Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1996 Feb;62(2):607–611. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.2.607-611.1996

Host range susceptibility of Enterococcus sp. strains isolated from diseased turbot: possible routes of infection.

J L Romalde 1, B Magariños 1, S Nuñez 1, J L Barja 1, A E Toranzo 1
PMCID: PMC167826  PMID: 8593061

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to assess the pathogenicity of Enterococcus sp. strains isolated from diseased turbot for several fish species (turbot, salmon, trout, and seabream), as well as for mice. The intraperitoneal injection assays indicated that the tested strains showed host specificity for turbot, with a high degree of virulence (50% lethal dose of 10(4) cells per g of fish). The Spanish Enterococcus sp. isolates were nonpathogenic for the other fish species studied and for mice. The possible routes of infection were determined by bath exposure (with and without prior abrasion of the skin) and by intragastric inoculations with food and feces contaminated with the pathogen. The bath challenges indicated that the Enterococcus isolates were able to overcome the defense mechanisms present on the surface of the turbot only if the skin was abraded prior to the exposure. The antibacterial activities of components of a glycoprotein nature present in the turbot skin mucus are probably responsible in part for the resistance in noninjured fish to infection. On the other hand, we demonstrated the capacity of this pathogen to overcome adverse conditions in the stomachs of fish when associated with food or fecal material, since it is able to establish an infective state and to produce mortalities after 16 to 20 days postingestion. From all of these findings, we can conclude that horizontal transmissions through water and the fecal-oral route are the main avenues of infection of turbot streptococcosis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Boomker J., Imes G. D., Jr, Cameron C. M., Naude T. W., Schoonbee H. J. Trout mortalities as a result of Streptococcus infection. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1979 Jun;46(2):71–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Devriese L. A., Pot B., Collins M. D. Phenotypic identification of the genus Enterococcus and differentiation of phylogenetically distinct enterococcal species and species groups. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993 Nov;75(5):399–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02794.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kusuda R., Kawai K., Salati F., Banner C. R., Fryer J. L. Enterococcus seriolicida sp. nov., a fish pathogen. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991 Jul;41(3):406–409. doi: 10.1099/00207713-41-3-406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Robinson J. A., Meyer F. P. Streptococcal fish pathogen. J Bacteriol. 1966 Aug;92(2):512–512. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.2.512-512.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Toranzo A. E., Barja J. L., Potter S. A., Colwell R. R., Hetrick F. M., Crosa J. H. Molecular factors associated with virulence of marine vibrios isolated from striped bass in Chesapeake Bay. Infect Immun. 1983 Mar;39(3):1220–1227. doi: 10.1128/iai.39.3.1220-1227.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES