Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
letter
. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):562–563. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.562-a

The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Comparison with mercury instrument is illogical.

H W Hense
PMCID: PMC1678634  PMID: 8400991

Full text

PDF

Page 562

562

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. "Failure" of the random zero sphygmomanometer in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Jul 13;291(6488):137–138. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6488.137-b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Conroy R. M., O'Brien E., O'Malley K., Atkins N. Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn? BMJ. 1993 May 15;306(6888):1319–1322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6888.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kronmal R. A., Rutan G. H., Manolio T. A., Borhani N. O. Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer. Hypertension. 1993 May;21(5):632–637. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.21.5.632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES