Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1993 Sep 18;307(6906):723–726. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6906.723

"Natural family planning": effective birth control supported by the Catholic Church.

R E Ryder 1
PMCID: PMC1678728  PMID: 8401097

Abstract

During 20-22 September Manchester is to host the 1993 follow up to last year's "earth summit" in Rio de Janeiro. At that summit the threat posed by world overpopulation received considerable attention. Catholicism was perceived as opposed to birth control and therefore as a particular threat. This was based on the notion that the only method of birth control approved by the church--natural family planning--is unreliable, unacceptable, and ineffective. In the 20 years since E L Billings and colleagues first described the cervical mucus symptoms associated with ovulation natural family planning has incorporated these symptoms and advanced considerably. Ultrasonography shows that the symptoms identify ovulation precisely. According to the World Health Organisation, 93% of women everywhere can identify the symptoms, which distinguish adequately between the fertile and infertile phases of the menstrual cycle. Most pregnancies during trials of natural family planning occur after intercourse at times recognised by couples as fertile. Thus pregnancy rates have depended on the motivation of couples. Increasingly studies show that rates equivalent to those with other contraceptive methods are readily achieved in the developed and developing worlds. Indeed, a study of 19,843 poor women in India had a pregnancy rate approaching zero. Natural family planning is cheap, effective, without side effects, and may be particularly acceptable to the efficacious among people in areas of poverty.

Full text

PDF
723

Images in this article

724p724-a
on p.724
724p724-b
on p.724
724p724-c
on p.724
724p724-d
on p.724
724p724-e
on p.724
724p724-f
on p.724
724p724-g
on p.724

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ball M. A prospective field trial of the "ovulation method" of avoiding conception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1976;6(2):63–66. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(76)90004-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Billings E. L., Brown J. B., Billings J. J., Burger H. G. Symptoms and hormonal changes accompanying ovulation. Lancet. 1972 Feb 5;1(7745):282–284. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90291-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christiansen C., Baastrup P. C., Transbol I. Lithium, hypercalcemia, hypermagnesemia, and hyperparathyroidism. Lancet. 1976 Oct 30;2(7992):969–969. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90941-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Depares J., Ryder R. E., Walker S. M., Scanlon M. F., Norman C. M. Ovarian ultrasonography highlights precision of symptoms of ovulation as markers of ovulation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Jun 14;292(6535):1562–1562. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6535.1562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorairaj K. The modified mucus method in India. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):2066–2067. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90584-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flynn A. M., Lynch S. S. Cervical mucus and identification of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976 Aug;83(8):656–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00906.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frank-Herrmann P., Freundl G., Baur S., Bremme M., Döring G. K., Godehardt E. A., Sottong U. Effectiveness and acceptibility of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Dec;165(6 Pt 2):2052–2054. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90580-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelly J. Audit of health services in Gurage. J Trop Pediatr. 1992 Aug;38(4):206–207. doi: 10.1093/tropej/38.4.206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laing J. E. Natural family planning in the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann. 1984 Mar-Apr;15(2):49–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marshall J. A field trial of the basal-body-temperature method of regulating births. Lancet. 1968 Jul 6;2(7558):8–10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)92886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marshall J. Cervical-mucus and basal body-temperature method of regulating births. Field trial. Lancet. 1976 Aug 7;2(7980):282–283. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)90732-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Marshall J. Letter: Natural family planning. Lancet. 1976 Sep 25;2(7987):685–685. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(76)92488-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mills A. Barrier contraception. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1984 Dec;11(3):641–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Poole J. Time for the Vatican to bend. Lancet. 1992 May 30;339(8805):1340–1341. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91972-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith S. F., Guz A., Cooke N. T., Burton G. H., Tetley T. D. Extracellular elastolytic activity in human lung lavage: a comparative study between smokers and non-smokers. Clin Sci (Lond) 1985 Jul;69(1):17–27. doi: 10.1042/cs0690017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Thomas M. L., Carty H., Hurley G. D. Cerebral hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia demonstrated angiographically. Australas Radiol. 1975 Jun;19(2):140–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1975.tb01933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vessey M., Lawless M., Yeates D. Efficacy of different contraceptive methods. Lancet. 1982 Apr 10;1(8276):841–842. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91885-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Weissmann M. C., Foliaki L., Billings E. L., Billings J. J. A trial of the ovulation method of family planning in Tonga. Lancet. 1972 Oct 14;2(7781):813–816. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES