Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1996 Aug;62(8):2845–2849. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.8.2845-2849.1996

Aminopeptidase N purified from gypsy moth brush border membrane vesicles is a specific receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIAc toxin.

M K Lee 1, T H You 1, B A Young 1, J A Cotrill 1, A P Valaitis 1, D H Dean 1
PMCID: PMC168070  PMID: 8702277

Abstract

We have evaluated the binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins to aminopeptidase N (APN) purified from Lymantria dispar (gypsy moth) brush border membrane vesicle (BBMV). CryIAc toxin bound strongly to APN, while either the structurally related CryIAa and CryIAb toxins or CryIC, CryIIA, and CryIIIA toxins showed weak binding to APN. An in vitro competition binding study demonstrated that the binding of CryIAc to L. dispar BBMV was inhibited by APN. Inhibition of short circuit current for CryIAc, measured by voltage clamping of whole L. dispar midgut, was substantially reduced by addition of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, which is known to release APN from the midgut membrane. In contrast, addition of phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C had only a marginal effect on the inhibition of short circuit current for CryIAa. These data suggest that APN is the major functional receptor for CryIAc in L. dispar BBMV. A ligand blotting experiment demonstrated that CryIAc recognized a 120-kDa peptide (APN), while CryIAa and CryIAb recognized a 210-kDa molecule in L. dispar BBMV. In contrast, CryIAa and CryIAb bound to both the 120- and 210-kDa molecules in Manduca sexta BBMV, while CryIAc recognized only the 120-kDa peptide. The 120-kDa peptide (APN) in L. dispar BBMV reacted with soybean agglutinin, indicating that N-acetylgalactosamine is a component of this glycoprotein.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (347.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Garczynski S. F., Crim J. W., Adang M. J. Identification of putative insect brush border membrane-binding molecules specific to Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin by protein blot analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Oct;57(10):2816–2820. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.10.2816-2820.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gill S. S., Cowles E. A., Pietrantonio P. V. The mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:615–636. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.003151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Harvey W. R., Wolfersberger M. G. Mechanism of inhibition of active potassium transport in isolated midgut of Manduca sexta by Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin. J Exp Biol. 1979 Dec;83:293–304. doi: 10.1242/jeb.83.1.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hofmann C., Lüthy P., Hütter R., Pliska V. Binding of the delta endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis to brush-border membrane vesicles of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Eur J Biochem. 1988 Apr 5;173(1):85–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988.tb13970.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hofmann C., Vanderbruggen H., Höfte H., Van Rie J., Jansens S., Van Mellaert H. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins is correlated with the presence of high-affinity binding sites in the brush border membrane of target insect midguts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Nov;85(21):7844–7848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.21.7844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Knight P. J., Knowles B. H., Ellar D. J. Molecular cloning of an insect aminopeptidase N that serves as a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(c) toxin. J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 28;270(30):17765–17770. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.30.17765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee M. K., Curtiss A., Alcantara E., Dean D. H. Synergistic effect of the Bacillus thuringiensis toxins CryIAa and CryIAc on the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Feb;62(2):583–586. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.2.583-586.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee M. K., Dean D. H. Inconsistencies in determining Bacillus thuringiensis toxin binding sites relationship by comparing competition assays with ligand blotting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Mar 27;220(3):575–580. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee M. K., Milne R. E., Ge A. Z., Dean D. H. Location of a Bombyx mori receptor binding region on a Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin. J Biol Chem. 1992 Feb 15;267(5):3115–3121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lee M. K., Rajamohan F., Gould F., Dean D. H. Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA delta-endotoxins in a laboratory-selected Heliothis virescens strain is related to receptor alteration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Nov;61(11):3836–3842. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.11.3836-3842.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liang Y., Patel S. S., Dean D. H. Irreversible binding kinetics of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA delta-endotoxins to gypsy moth brush border membrane vesicles is directly correlated to toxicity. J Biol Chem. 1995 Oct 20;270(42):24719–24724. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.42.24719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martínez-Ramírez A. C., González-Nebauer S., Escriche B., Real M. D. Ligand blot identification of a Manduca sexta midgut binding protein specific to three Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA-type ICPs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994 Jun 15;201(2):782–787. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Masson L., Mazza A., Brousseau R., Tabashnik B. Kinetics of Bacillus thuringiensis toxin binding with brush border membrane vesicles from susceptible and resistant larvae of Plutella xylostella. J Biol Chem. 1995 May 19;270(20):11887–11896. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.20.11887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oddou P., Hartmann H., Geiser M. Identification and characterization of Heliothis virescens midgut membrane proteins binding Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Eur J Biochem. 1991 Dec 5;202(2):673–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oddou P., Hartmann H., Radecke F., Geiser M. Immunologically unrelated Heliothis sp. and Spodoptera sp. midgut membrane-proteins bind Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA(b) delta-endotoxin. Eur J Biochem. 1993 Feb 15;212(1):145–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb17644.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sangadala S., Walters F. S., English L. H., Adang M. J. A mixture of Manduca sexta aminopeptidase and phosphatase enhances Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal CryIA(c) toxin binding and 86Rb(+)-K+ efflux in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 1;269(13):10088–10092. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Takesue S., Yokota K., Miyajima S., Taguchi R., Ikezawa H., Takesue Y. Partial release of aminopeptidase N from larval midgut cell membranes of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, by phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1992 May;102(1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(92)90263-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vadlamudi R. K., Ji T. H., Bulla L. A., Jr A specific binding protein from Manduca sexta for the insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. berliner. J Biol Chem. 1993 Jun 15;268(17):12334–12340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Vadlamudi R. K., Weber E., Ji I., Ji T. H., Bulla L. A., Jr Cloning and expression of a receptor for an insecticidal toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Biol Chem. 1995 Mar 10;270(10):5490–5494. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.10.5490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Valaitis A. P., Lee M. K., Rajamohan F., Dean D. H. Brush border membrane aminopeptidase-N in the midgut of the gypsy moth serves as the receptor for the CryIA(c) delta-endotoxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1995 Dec;25(10):1143–1151. doi: 10.1016/0965-1748(95)00050-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Van Rie J., Jansens S., Höfte H., Degheele D., Van Mellaert H. Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins. Importance of specific receptors on the brush border membrane of the mid-gut of target insects. Eur J Biochem. 1989 Dec 8;186(1-2):239–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1989.tb15201.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Rie J., McGaughey W. H., Johnson D. E., Barnett B. D., Van Mellaert H. Mechanism of insect resistance to the microbial insecticide Bacillus thuringiensis. Science. 1990 Jan 5;247(4938):72–74. doi: 10.1126/science.2294593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Whiteley H. R., Schnepf H. E. The molecular biology of parasporal crystal body formation in Bacillus thuringiensis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1986;40:549–576. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.40.100186.003001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wolfersberger M. G. The toxicity of two Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxins to gypsy moth larvae is inversely related to the affinity of binding sites on midgut brush border membranes for the toxins. Experientia. 1990 May 15;46(5):475–477. doi: 10.1007/BF01954236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES