Introduction
Acute leukemia is the most common childhood malignancy, which accounts for approximately one third of all pediatric cancers. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) constitutes about 75% of pediatric acute leukemias. The incidence of ALL in the United States is approximately 3.4 cases per 100,000 individuals less than 15 years of age. The peak incidence of childhood ALL occurs between ages 3 and 4.[1,2] In the United States, the incidence of ALL is higher in whites than in African Americans by a ratio of 1.8: 1. In addition, ALL is slightly more common in boys than in girls.[3,4]
Genetic factors may predispose children to develop leukemia. Germline chromosomal abnormalities have been associated with childhood leukemia.[5–7] Environmental factors, eg, exposure to pesticides and herbicides; maternal use of alcohol, cigarettes, and contraceptives; and chemical contamination of groundwater have all been studied, although no definitive link to the development of childhood ALL has been established.[8,9]
Pathophysiology
The development of ALL, like other malignancies of hematologic origin, is believed to involve a transformation event that occurs in a single progenitor cell that has the capability for indefinite clonal expansion. The leukemogenic event may occur in committed lymphoid cells of B- or T-cell lineages or in early precursors, which gives rise to the different subtypes of ALL based on the stage of lymphoid differentiation of the cell in which the event occurred.[9] About 80% of all cases of ALL express cell-surface markers indicative of a precursor B-cell lineage. Only 1% to 2% of cases express a phenotype typical of a mature B cell. T-cell ALL accounts for about 15% to 20% of cases and is commonly associated with features at diagnosis, such as older age, male predominance, high white blood cell (WBC) count, and extramedullary disease, all of which indicate the need for increased intensity of chemotherapy.[10]
The identification of specific chromosomal abnormalities plays an important role in determining therapy and prognosis in certain subtypes of ALL. Some of the more common chromosomal abnormalities in ALL include the TEL-AML1 fusion gene, which by molecular techniques, can be found in 25% of cases of pre-B ALL.[10] The presence of this translocation carries a more favorable prognosis. The bcr-abl t(9,22) p180 translocation is found in only about 3% to 5% of cases of childhood ALL. The presence of this translocation is associated with a high WBC count at diagnosis and a poor response to therapy.[11] Rearrangements of the MLL gene at chromosome band 11q23 are found in 80% of cases of ALL in infants. Unfortunately, young children with this genetic abnormality have a very poor prognosis and a survival of less than 20% despite intensive therapy.[12–15] Children, with MLL gene rearrangements, > 1 year of age at diagnosis were found to have better prognoses than those of infants with the same translocation, but far worse than age-matched patients without rearrangements of the MLL gene.[16]
Diagnosis and Clinical Presentation
Children with ALL develop symptoms related to infiltration of blasts in the bone marrow, lymphoid system, and extramedullary sites, such as the central nervous system (CNS). Common constitutional symptoms include fever (60%), fatigue (50%), pallor (25%), and weight loss (26%). Infiltration of blast cells in the marrow cavity and periosteum often lead to bone pain (23%) and disruption of normal hematopoiesis. Thrombocytopenia with platelet counts less than 100,000 are seen in about 75% of patients. Approximately 40% of patients with childhood ALL present with hemoglobin levels less than 7 g/dL. Although leukocyte counts greater than 50,000/mm3 occur in 20% of cases, neutropenia defined as an absolute neutrophil count less than 500 is common at presentation and is associated with an increased risk of infection.[15,16] Infiltration of the lymphoid system may cause lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly. CNS involvement is found in less than 5% of children at presentation. When present, the signs and symptoms include headache, vomiting, papilledema, and sixth-nerve palsy.[17–19]
Although peripheral blasts with anemia and thrombocytopenia are strongly suggestive of ALL, the definitive diagnosis of ALL is based on the bone marrow aspiration or biopsy demonstrating more than 25% lymphoblasts. In patients with large leukemia cell burden, serum chemistries may reveal signs of tumor lysis, including hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and lactic acidosis. Serum uric acid may be elevated due to increased cell turnover. Tumor lysis can be a metabolic emergency at the time of presentation and may be exacerbated by initiation of therapy.[20]
Once the diagnosis of ALL is made, cytogenetic analysis, immunophenotyping by flow cytometry, and immunohistochemical staining are performed to further characterize ALL subtype and guide therapy. A lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid examination are also performed to determine the presence of occult CNS involvement.
Treatment
The currently accepted philosophy behind treatment of pediatric ALL is based on the recognition of the heterogeneity of the disease. Although it is no longer acceptable to treat all cases of childhood ALL with a single treatment regimen, there are 4 basic phases in all treatment protocols. These phases include remission induction, treatment of clinical or occult CNS disease (consolidation), intensification, and maintenance therapy. The goals of induction therapy are to attain remission, defined as the absence of evidence of leukemia, which includes the absence of CNS or testicular disease, and to have bone marrow examination showing normal cellularity with fewer than 5% lymphoblasts. The 3-drug combination of vincristine, a glucocorticoid, and L-asparaginase successfully induces remission in 95% of children with ALL.[21]
Intrathecal therapy has increased event-free survival by preventing relapse in the CNS where the blood-brain barrier provides a “sanctuary” from systemic chemotherapeutic agents.[22,23] Although cranial irradiation is used in some protocols, it is usually restricted to therapy for high-risk ALL and patients with proven CNS disease because of the significant neurotoxic sequelae. Given immediately after remission induction, consolidation therapy is particularly important in high-risk ALL, such as T-cell ALL and the infant form of ALL, in addition to patients with CNS disease. Maintenance chemotherapy usually includes daily administration of 6-mercaptopurine (6MP) in addition to intermittent methotrexate. Duration of therapy differs among centers and protocols, but, on average, therapy lasts 2.5 years. Generally, boys are treated for 3 years and girls 2 years, secondary to the recognition that boys are more likely to relapse.[24] Most relapses are treated with intensified regimens of chemotherapy.
Because of the relatively high rates of disease-free survival in ALL, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is reserved for patients who fail to respond to induction therapy, those who relapse during treatment, or those who relapse within 1 year following completion of chemotherapy. Risk stratification has classically been based on the 2 prognostic factors that have been most consistent in retrospective analyses: age at presentation and initial WBC count. The future of ALL therapy involves gene-expression profiling and immunophenotyping to classify children into various risk groups that will influence treatment decisions. Although there is a growing consensus that this is feasible, it is not currently the standard of care.[25,26]
Prognosis
Over the past decade, advances in the treatment of childhood ALL have led to the current long-term, event-free survival rates of about 80%. Despite the overall good prognosis, some of the less common subtypes are at high risk of relapse. There is no universally accepted method of stratifying patients into risk groups, but there are clinical features of ALL that are generally acknowledged as prognostic factors. Age, sex, and initial leukocyte count are consistently cited as important prognostic factors.[27]
Patients between the ages of 2 and 10 years tend to have a more favorable prognosis. Infant ALL carries a high risk of early relapse despite intensive chemotherapy. These patients tend to have high initial WBC counts, CNS involvement at presentation, thrombocytopenia, massive organomegaly, and unfavorable karyotypic features, suggesting that this disease may be biologically different from typical ALL.[28] In most studies, girls have more favorable prognoses than boys. The reason is not completely understood. Initial WBC count is accepted as a prognostic indicator at diagnosis. Those with high initial WBC counts (greater than 50,000 per mm3) have poorer prognoses. T-cell ALL commonly presents with a high leukocyte count and has a high rate of lymphoblast proliferation.[29,30]
Race also appears to be a prognostic factor. Despite the lower incidence of childhood ALL in African Americans, prognosis is poorer than for white children. This is thought to be, in part, due to the fact that African American children tend to develop subtypes of ALL considered to be higher risk, such as T-cell ALL. Hispanic children also have an increased incidence of high-risk disease when compared with whites, but less so than African Americans.[31] Patients with a DNA index > 1.16 (eg, hyperdiploid) have better prognoses than those with a DNA index < 1.16.[32]
Future Challenges and Novel Therapies
One of the major problems in pediatric oncology is the need to design better therapy for children with ALL who relapse. This population of children represents the largest group of patients with cancer refractory to current therapies. Although recent improvement in survival is encouraging, there continues to be a subset of patients with childhood ALL who relapse, and about 20% of patients die of the disease.[33] Intensive regimens, including nucleoside analogs (such as gemcitabine and clofarabine), have shown promise in the treatment of heavily pretreated children with relapsed or refractory leukemia. Multicenter, phase 2 trials with a reinduction regimen of topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine are ongoing.[34–36] In addition, current modalities of therapy are nonspecific, causing significant risk to normal tissues.
Exciting work is being done to identify target-specific therapies to minimize toxicity and improve event-free survival. Imatinib mesylate is an example of an inhibitor of a tyrosine kinase involved in the pathogenesis of chronic myelogenous leukemia that has shown some efficacy, albeit limited, in the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL.[37] As encouraging as these novel approaches may be, they are far from being accepted as the standard of care for a disease that still imparts substantial morbidity and mortality.
Contributor Information
Samuel D. Esparza, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Mattel Children's Hospital at the University of California at Los Angeles.
Kathleen M. Sakamoto, Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Mattel Children's Hospital at the University of California at Los Angeles.
References
- 1.Pui CH. Pediatric oncology: acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1997;44:831–846. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70532-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.DiAngio GJ. Old man river. The flow of pediatric oncology. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2001;15:599–607. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70238-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woodruff TJ, Axelrad DA, Kyle AD, Nweke O, Miller GG, Hurley BJ. Trends in environmentally related childhood illnesses. Pediatrics. 2004;113(supp):1133–1140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Incidence – SEER 9 Regs Public-Use, Nov 2003 Sub (1973–2001). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Cancer Statistics Branch, released April 2004, based on the November 2003 submission. Available at: http://www.seer.cancer.gov Accessed February 4, 2005.
- 5.Spirito FR, Mancini M, Dermi V, et al. Trisomy 13 in a patient with common acute lymphoblasitc leukemia: description of a case and review of the literature. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2003;144:69–72. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(02)00924-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mertens AC, Wen W, Davies SM, et al. Congenital abnormalities in children with acute leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. J Pediatr. 1998;133:617–623. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70100-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zipursky A, Poon A, Doyle J. Leukemia in Down syndrome: a review. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1992;9:139–149. doi: 10.3109/08880019209018329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shumacher HR. Acute leukemia. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22:153–192. doi: 10.1016/s0272-2712(03)00071-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Reaman GH. Pediatric oncology: current views and outcomes. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2002;49:1305–1318. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(02)00102-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, editors. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 4th ed. Philadelphia Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Greaves M. Childhood leukaemia. BMJ. 2002;324:283–287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lai R. Pathologic diagnosis of acute lymphocytic leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14:1209–1235. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70183-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martinez-Climent JA. Molecular cytogenetics of childhood hematological malignancies. Leukemia. 1997;11:1999–2021. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2400842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lanzkowsky P. Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 3rd ed. San Diego, Ca: Academic Press; 2000. pp. 359–372. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Silverman LB, Sallan SE. Newly diagnosed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2003;10:290–296. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200307000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dworzak MN, Panzer-Grumayer ER. Flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44:1445–1455. doi: 10.3109/10428190309178763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Craig FE. Bone marrow evaluation in pediatric patients. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2003;20:237–246. doi: 10.1016/s0740-2570(03)00029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ma SK, Chan GC, Ha SY, et al. Clinical presentation, hematologic features, and treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review of 73 cases in Hong Kong. Hematol Oncol. 1997;15:141–149. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1069(199708)15:3<141::aid-hon608>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Downing JR, Shannon KM. Acute leukemia: a pediatric perspective. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:437–445. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Turtureanu HE. Emergency care: the tumor lysis syndrome. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2002;106:705–711. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pui CH, Ribiero RC. International collaboration on childhood leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2003;78:383–389. doi: 10.1007/BF02983810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pinkel D, Woo S. Prevention and treatment of meningeal leukemia in children. Blood. 1994;84:355–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nathan PC, Maze R, Spegler B, et al. CNS-directed therapy in young children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;42:24–29. doi: 10.1002/pbc.10392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chessells JM, Veys P, Kempski H, et al. Long term follow-up of relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Br J Haematol. 2003;123:396–405. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hayashi Y. Gene expression profiling in childhood acute leukemia: progress and perspectives. Int J Hematol. 2003;78:414–420. doi: 10.1007/BF02983813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manera R, Ramirez I, Mullins J, Pinkel D. Pilot studies of species-specific chemotherapy of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia using genotype and immunophenotype. Leukemia. 2000;14:1354–1361. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pui CH, Boyett JM, Rivera GK, et al. Long term results of total therapy studies 11, 12, and 13A for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Leukemia. 2000;14:2286–2294. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Isaacs H. Fetal and neonatal leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003;25:348–361. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200305000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Plasschert SL, Kamps WA, Vellenga E, de Vries EG, de Bont ES. Prognosis in childhood and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a question of maturation? Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:37–51. doi: 10.1016/S0305-7372(03)00140-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bradbury J. Brighter future for children with T-ALL. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4:650–652. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(03)01263-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pui CH, Sandlund JT, Pei D, et al. Results of therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in black and white children. JAMA. 2003;290:2001–2007. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.15.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Rubnitz JE, Pui CH. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncologist. 1997;2:374–380. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Green E, McConville CM, Powell JE, et al. Clonal diversity of Ig and TCR gene rearrangements identifies a subset of childhood B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with increased risk of relapse. Blood. 1998;92:952–958. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Steinherz PG, Seibel NL, Ames M, et al. Phase I study of gemcitabine in children with relapsed or refractory leukemia. CCG 0955: a report from Children's Cancer Group. Leuk Lymphoma. 2002;43:1945–1950. doi: 10.1080/1042819021000015880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kolb EA, Steinherz PG. A new multidrug reinduction protocol with topotecan, vinorelbine, thiotepa, dexamethasone, and gemcitabine for relapsed or refractory acute leukemia. Leukemia. 2003;17:1967–1972. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jeha S, Gandhi V, Chan KW, et al. Clofarabine, a novel nucleoside analog, is active in pediatric patients with advanced leukemia. Blood. 2004;103:784–789. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-06-2122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hongo T, Okada S, Inoue N, et al. Two groups of Philadelphia chromosome-positive childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia classified by pretreatment multidrug sensitivity or resistance in in vitro testing. Int J Hematol. 2002;76:251–259. doi: 10.1007/BF02982795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]