Abstract
Potassium channels that are inhibited by internal ATP (KATP channels) provide a critical link between metabolism and cellular excitability. Protein kinase C (PKC) acts on KATP channels to regulate diverse cellular processes, including cardioprotection by ischemic preconditioning and pancreatic insulin secretion. PKC action decreases the Hill coefficient of ATP binding to cardiac KATP channels, thereby increasing their open probability at physiological ATP concentrations. We show that PKC similarly regulates recombinant channels from both the pancreas and heart. Surprisingly, PKC acts via phosphorylation of a specific, conserved threonine residue (T180) in the pore-forming subunit (Kir6.2). Additional PKC consensus sites exist on both Kir and the larger sulfonylurea receptor (SUR) subunits. Nonetheless, T180 controls changes in open probability induced by direct PKC action either in the absence of, or in complex with, the accessory SUR1 (pancreatic) or SUR2A (cardiac) subunits. The high degree of conservation of this site among different KATP channel isoforms suggests that this pathway may have wide significance for the physiological regulation of KATP channels in various tissues and organelles.
Potassium channels that are inhibited by ATP (KATP channels) consist of a heterooctamer of four sulfonylurea receptor (SURx) and four inwardly rectifying K+ channel (Kir6.x) subunits (1–5). The SUR is a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family of proteins and acts as a regulatory subunit, conferring ADP sensitivity and the distinctive pharmacological characteristics on the KATP channel complex (1–6). In contrast, the Kir6.x subunit forms the pore of the channel and mediates the defining ATP-dependent inhibition of KATP channels (6). Protein kinase-catalyzed phosphorylation is an important mechanism by which the activity of ion channels, including the KATP channel, can be controlled (7–9). For instance, another ABC protein ion channel, the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, is regulated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation, which, itself, may be permissively regulated by protein kinase C (PKC) (8, 10, 11). In addition, mounting evidence suggests the importance of PKC in activating KATP channels during both the protective mechanism of ischemic preconditioning (12, 13) and in regulating insulin secretion (14), although the site(s) and mechanism of action of PKC-mediated phosphorylation events have not been described. Therefore, we sought to determine: (i) the functional effects of PKC on the KATP channel, (ii) whether the action of PKC is mediated via the SUR or Kir6.2 subunit, and (iii) the identity of specific amino acid residue(s) phosphorylated by PKC.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture and Transfection.
tsA201 cells (an SV40-transformed variant of the HEK293 human embryonic kidney cell line) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10 mM glucose/2 mM l-glutamine/10% FCS/0.1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C (10% CO2). Cells were plated at 30–40% confluence on 35-mm culture dishes 4 h before transfection. KATP channel subunit clones were generously provided by Lydia Aguilar-Bryan and Joseph Bryan (hamster SUR1; ref. 4) and Susumu Seino (mouse Kir6.2 and rat SUR2A; ref. 5). Clones were inserted into mammalian expression vectors (pCDNA3 or pCMV6) and were transfected into tsA201 cells by calcium phosphate precipitation. Transfected cells were identified by using coexpression of the KATP channel subunit clones with the green fluorescent protein [Green Lantern (pGL); Life Technologies, Rockville, MD]. Recordings were made from cells 48–72 h after transfection. Coexpression of pGL or pCDNA3 without any channel constructs inserted did not produce any measurable whole-cell current (data not shown).
Electrophysiology.
The nystatin-perforated patch technique was used to measure whole-cell currents while maintaining the integrity of the intracellular environment (15). Block by external barium (2 mM) was used to reversibly indicate the amount of ΔC26 current present. For cells coexpressing the SUR isoforms (SUR1 and SUR2A), block by glibenclamide (10 μM) also was used to indicate the amplitude of KATP current.
All whole-cell recordings were made with symmetrical K+ (140 mM), using 100-ms command steps from −90 to +60 mV at 10-mV intervals, to establish current–voltage relationships. Data were acquired and analyzed by using pclamp 5.5 and 6.0 software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).
Standard patch-clamp techniques were used to record single-channel currents in the inside-out patch configuration. The internal faces of the patches were exposed to test solutions via a multiinput perfusion pipette (solution changes complete in <2 s). Single-channel currents were recorded at fixed holding potentials, amplified (Axopatch 200; Axon Instruments), digitized (Neuro-corder DR-384; Neuro Data Instruments, New York), and then stored on videotape. Data were sampled at 500 Hz and filtered at 200 Hz, with the exception of the recordings shown in Fig. 4D, which were sampled at 2.5 kHz and filtered at 1 kHz.
The pipette solution used for all patch recordings contained the following: 140 mM KCl, 10 mM Hepes, 1.4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 10 mM glucose. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.4 with KOH. This solution also was used to superfuse the cells/patches for experiments using symmetrical K+.
ATP (as MgATP; Sigma) was added as required from a 10-mM stock, which was prepared immediately before use. Glibenclamide (Sigma) was stored as a 10-mM stock solution in DMSO. 4-β-Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma) and 4-α-phorbol 12,13-didecanoate (PDD) (Calbiochem) were stored in ethanol at a concentration of 1 × 10−4 M at −20°C. Chelerythrine chloride (Calbiochem) was stored at 5 mM in distilled H2O at −20°C. All drugs were diluted to the required concentration immediately before use.
PKC was purified from rat brain and rendered constitutively active by proteolytic cleavage by using the techniques described previously (16). In patch-clamp experiments, PKC was used at a final concentration of 20 nM.
Statistical significance was evaluated by using Student's paired t test. Differences with values of probability P < 0.05 were considered to be significant. Values in the text are given as mean ± SEM.
Molecular Biology.
Point mutations were introduced into the mouse Kir6.2 clone and the Kir6.2 ΔC26 construct by using the Unique Site Elimination (U.S.E.) Mutagenesis Kit (Amersham Pharmacia). The truncated Kir6.2 construct ΔC26 was made by the introduction of a stop codon at the appropriate position. The coding sequence for an N-terminal M5-FLAG fusion protein (Sigma) was introduced into the coding region of the ΔC26 construct immediately after the methionine start codon. Measurable glibenclamide-insensitive whole-cell currents were obtained, after dialysis with an ATP-free pipette solution, from cells expressing the ΔC26 and ΔC26/FLAG constructs (data not shown). The rabbit heart Kir6.2 clone was identified by PCR screening of a rabbit heart λgt10 cDNA library by using a probe based on the pore region of Kir6.1 and Kir6.2. KpnI restriction site analysis and sequencing then were used to confirm the identity of the Kir6.2 clone.
Phosphorylation Assays.
Membrane proteins from tsA201 cells cotransfected with either the ΔC26/FLAG or ΔC26(T180A/E)/FLAG constructs plus pGL were isolated by using procedures described previously (17). Protein phosphorylation was performed in vitro on membrane fractions, using [γ-32P]ATP as a substrate for PKC and using the techniques described previously (17). 32P-labeled C26Δ/FLAG proteins then were extracted from the crude membrane preparation by using M5-FLAG affinity beads (Sigma) and then subjected to autoradiographic analysis. Western blot analysis was performed in parallel by using the enhanced chemiluminescence procedure (Amersham Pharmacia) with M5-FLAG antibody. Neither significant phosphorylation nor FLAG antibody staining was detected at the molecular mass (45 kDa) corresponding to ΔC26/FLAG on gels or Western blots of crude membrane protein from the following: untransfected tsA201 cells or cells transfected with pGL alone (not shown). Nor was any significant phosphorylation detected in membrane preparations to which boiled PKC was added or to which no PKC was added. Labeling of a 45-kDa protein was detected in cells transfected with ΔC26/FLAG after application of PMA to intact cells to stimulate PKC activity in the presence of 32P-labeled orthophosphate.
Using either crude membrane homogenates or purified ΔC26/FLAG protein, a reduction in the amount of PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation was always observed when the threonine residue at position 180 was substituted by an alanine or glutamate residue. The inability of PKC peptide inhibitor PKC(19–31) to completely abolish PKC-mediated phosphorylation probably can be attributed to its effective “quenching” by the excess protein in crude tissue homogenates used for the phosphorylation reaction (see ref. 18). In separate experiments using affinity bead-purified ΔC26/FLAG protein as substrate, PKC(19–31) appeared more effective in blocking the effects of PKC (data not shown). Also, in inside-out patch recordings, 5 μM PKC(19–31) completely inhibited up-regulation of channel activity by PKC (Fig. 1A Inset). Thus, PKC(19–31) effectively inhibited PKC action in the absence of excess protein.
Accession Numbers.
Kir6.2 GenBank accession numbers for mouse, human, and rat amino acid sequences are Q61743, Q14654, and D8603, respectively. The rabbit Kir6.2 sequence is identical to the sequence entered into GenBank by E. Marban, M. Janecki, and B. O'Rourke (accession no. AAB61473).
RESULTS
PKC and KATP Channel Activation.
Our earlier studies on cardiac myocytes showed that PKC increases the open probability of KATP channels at physiological levels of ATP by reducing the Hill coefficient for the ATP dose–response curve, thus rendering the channel less sensitive to inhibition by high ATP concentrations (16). One possible interpretation of this observation is that phosphorylation reduces the positive cooperativity of ATP binding required for inhibition. To further understand the underlying mechanisms, we have studied the cardiac (SUR2A/Kir6.2) and pancreatic beta cell (SUR1/Kir6.2) isoforms of the KATP channel (1–3) expressed in mammalian cells. Use of the patch-clamp technique in the excised inside-out patch configuration showed that constitutively active PKC caused a 390 ± 78% increase in channel activity (measured as NPo, the product of N, the number of channels in the patch, and Po, the mean open probability) for SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels (Fig. 1A). The effect of PKC was blocked by concomitant treatment with the specific PKC inhibitor peptide PKC(19–31) (35 ± 14% increase, Fig. 1A Inset). PKC also induced a similar increase in NPo (360 ± 31%, n = 5) for pancreatic beta cell KATP (SUR1/Kir6.2) channels (Fig. 1D). Construction of ATP dose-inhibition curves revealed that PKC reduced the Hill coefficient from 1.65 to a value of 1.10 in SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels (Fig. 1C). The calculated crossover point of the curves was 110 μM ATP, indicating that, at higher ATP concentrations, the effect of PKC will be excitatory (Fig. 1A), whereas at lower ATP concentrations (<110 μM), the effect of PKC will be inhibitory (Fig. 1B). These findings parallel those observed previously on native cardiac KATP channels (16) and indicate that the recombinant channels contain all of the mechanistic elements required for this behavior. In the majority of patches tested (13 of 19), the effect of PKC was partially or fully reversible upon washout of the kinase. This reversal was prevented by treatment with okadaic acid (10 nM), a protein phosphatase inhibitor (19), indicating the presence of an endogenous phosphatase (data not shown).
PKC Acts on the Kir6.2 Subunit.
The recent discovery that Kir6.2 forms functional ATP-sensitive channels in the absence of SUR, when the C-terminal 26 aa are removed to yield the deletion mutant ΔC26 (6), provided a useful approach to determine whether PKC acts via the SUR or Kir6.2 subunit. We studied PKC action after expressing either ΔC26, in the absence of the associated SUR subunit, or the full-length Kir6.2 subunit with either SUR1 or SUR2A.
In cells expressing ΔC26 alone, application of the membrane-permeant phorbol ester PMA (100 nM), a PKC activator, caused a significant increase in whole-cell current (P < 0.05) of 376 ± 120% (Fig. 2 A and B). PMA failed to activate any current (4.5 ± 14% increase, P = 0.26, Fig. 2B) when cells were pretreated for 10 min with chelerythrine (5 μM), a membrane-permeant PKC inhibitor (20). The inactive phorbol ester analog, PDD (100 nM), did not increase the ΔC26 current (6.1 ± 10% increase, P = 0.67, Fig. 2 A and B). Thus, activation of PKC enhances KATP channel currents in the absence of the sulfonylurea receptor subunit to a similar extent as with the wild-type, heterooctameric channels (Fig. 2B).
Coexpression of the β-pancreatic SUR isoform, SUR1, with Kir6.2 also yielded currents that were enhanced by PMA. A significant increase in current of 440 ± 210% was observed (P < 0.05). The PMA-induced current was sensitive to glibenclamide (increment reduced to 42 ± 40%). No significant increase in current (43 ± 47%, P = 0.5) resulted from application of PDD. In addition, coexpression of Kir6.2 with the cardiac SUR isoform, SUR2A, yielded currents that showed a significant increase in response to PMA (240 ± 43%, P < 0.05). This increment was glibenclamide-sensitive (reduced to 18 ± 6%, Fig. 2B). Excised, inside-out patches from cells expressing the ΔC26 construct consistently revealed an ATP-sensitive current with fast-gating kinetics (Fig. 2 C and D). In the recording illustrated in Fig. 2D (1 mM ATP), PKC increased Po by ≈300% (0.01 to 0.043). The mean open time, however, remained unchanged after addition of PKC (1.93 ms, control vs. 2.06 ms, PKC). A similar stimulatory effect of PKC on ΔC26 channels was observed in each of five patches tested at ATP concentrations of 0.5 and 1 mM. At low concentrations of ATP (50 μM), PKC caused an inhibition of ΔC26 current in a similar manner to that observed with SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels (36 ± 12% decrease, n = 3 patches, P < 0.05, Fig. 2D).
PKC Functionally Phosphorylates a Single Residue in Kir6.2.
The above findings provide strong evidence that the stimulatory effect of PKC occurs via the Kir6.2 subunit, because it is observed in the absence of the SUR subunit. Therefore, we set out to identify which amino acid residue(s) in Kir6.2 may be phosphorylated by PKC. Recent work indicates that ATP binding occurs in the Kir6.2 subunit and mutations at sites in the proximal C terminus of the Kir6.2 subunit can alter gating and ATP binding (6, 21). For example, K185 is important in determining the ATP sensitivity of the Kir6.2 subunit expressed alone (as ΔC26) (6). PKC consensus sites have at least one basic residue (arginine or lysine) several positions upstream or downstream (or preferably both) from the phosphorylated residue (22). Four highly conserved, potential PKC phosphorylation sites were identified in Kir6.2 (Fig. 3). Of these four sites, T180 lies in the best PKC recognition sequence, with R176 and R177 lying upstream and K185 downstream. In addition, R176 and R177 are thought to interact with anionic phospholipids, which modulate the ATP sensitivity of the channel (23, 24). To determine whether these residues are conserved in the rabbit [the species used for our earlier studies on native KATP channels (16)], we cloned the full-length coding region of rabbit heart Kir6.2. Sequence analysis revealed a high degree of identity (>93%) of Kir6.2 from rat, mouse, human, and rabbit. Both T180 and K185 are conserved in these species, as are the two positively charged arginines at positions 176 and 177. These residues are also conserved in Kir6.1, which may form the pore of other KATP channel isoforms.
To test the hypothesis that T180 is necessary for PKC-induced modulation, we examined the effects of replacing this residue with alanine (T180A) or glutamate (T180E) in both full-length Kir6.2 and ΔC26 constructs. In whole-cell, perforated-patch recordings, application of 100 nM PMA to cells expressing either the ΔC26(T180A) or ΔC26(T180E) constructs had no significant effect on current [7.2 ± 6.0% and 13 ± 4.6% increments, respectively (P > 0.05); see Fig. 4A]. To determine whether the SUR subunit confers any additional PKC-induced activation of current, cells were cotransfected with SUR2A and a full-length Kir6.2(T180A) mutant. Application of PMA had no significant effect on the SUR2A/Kir6.2(T180A) whole-cell current (8.7 ± 7.4%, P > 0.05, Fig. 4B). Excised inside-out macropatch recordings from cells expressing the ΔC26(T180A) construct revealed no effect of PKC on channel open probability in any of three patches tested (Fig. 4C). Thus, T180 appears to be essential for the PKC-induced increase of KATP currents, regardless of whether Kir6.2 is coassembled with SUR.
In single-channel recordings, the ΔC26(T180A) construct gave rise to channels showing a markedly longer open state than the ΔC26 construct. The mean open time was increased from ≈1 ms in ΔC26 channels to ≈40 ms in ΔC26(T180A) channels (Fig. 4D). Similar results were observed with T180E, suggesting that charge at this location is not the sole determinant of gating behavior. Nonetheless, these observations reinforce the argument that this region of the Kir subunit is a critical determinant of channel-gating behavior. It should be noted that the ΔC26(T180A) mutant lost activity or “ran down” faster in excised patches than wild-type ΔC26 or SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels. We were unable to record activity from the ΔC26(T180E) mutant in the inside-out patch configuration.
PKC Directly Phosphorylates T180 in Kir6.2.
To test biochemically whether PKC phosphorylates residue T180 in the Kir6.2 subunit, we engineered an M5-FLAG epitope onto the N terminus of the ΔC26 Kir6.2 truncation mutant (ΔC26/FLAG) and also onto the ΔC26/FLAG construct in which T180 was replaced by alanine [ΔC26(T180A)/FLAG] to remove the putative phosphoacceptor site. Membrane protein fractions from cells transfected with either the ΔC26/FLAG or ΔC26(T180A)/FLAG construct were subjected to in vitro PKC phosphorylation assays by using [γ-32P]ATP as the phosphate donor. Western blot analysis of the purified (ΔC26/FLAG) proteins (using an M5-FLAG antibody) showed a distinct protein band at ≈45 kDa, the predicted molecular mass of one subunit of Kir6.2 (Fig. 5B). Autoradiographs of the purified (ΔC26/FLAG) proteins revealed that the single amino acid substitution of T180 by alanine almost completely abolished the PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation in the corresponding band (see Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and 2). Similar results were obtained in experiments with ΔC26(T180E)/FLAG. Pretreatment with chelerythrine (20), at a concentration that specifically blocks PKC action, largely prevented 32P labeling (Fig. 5A, lanes 5 and 6). The PKC pseudosubstrate inhibitor peptide, PKC(19–31) (25), reduced the level of phosphorylation to a variable extent (Fig. 5A, lanes 3 and 4; see Materials and Methods, Phosphorylation Assays section, for discussion).
Discussion
Our electrophysiological data reveal that removal of the phosphoacceptor site at T180 eliminates the stimulatory effects of PKC on the KATP channel; the biochemical results show that the level of PKC-catalyzed Kir6.2 phosphorylation is markedly reduced by mutations at this site. Other residues in the Kir6.2 subunit also may be phosphorylated to a lesser extent, but do not significantly influence channel activity in our electrical recordings. Thus, we conclude that the up-regulation by PKC of KATP channel activity can be assigned to phosphorylation at T180 in the Kir6.2 subunit. In contrast, it has been shown recently that protein kinase A phosphorylates the serines at positions 372 in the Kir6.2 subunit and 1,571 in the SUR1 receptor (26).
The sensitivity of the KATP channel to sulfonylureas, KATP channel openers, and ADP, is conferred upon the channel by the SUR protein, with some of these effects being isoform-specific (1–3). In contrast, the K+-conducting, inward rectification, and characteristic ATP-dependent inhibition of the KATP channel resides in the Kir6.2 subunit (6). Single-channel recordings from the ΔC26(T180A) mutant show that this mutation also affects gating kinetics, stabilizing the open state of the channel (Fig. 4D). Together, our findings underline the importance of the proximal C terminus in determining the ATP sensitivity and the gating behavior of the channel. The proximity of residue T180 to identified regions (R176, R177) of phospholipid binding (23, 24), the increased run-down of the ΔC26(T180A) mutant, and the lack of ΔC26(T180E) activity in inside-out patches combine to suggest that this region is important in controlling both phospholipid sensitivity and run-down of the KATP channel complex (23, 24). Moreover, interactions between PKC- and phospholipid-mediated modulation would raise the possibility of up- or down-regulation of activity. Thus, phospholipids and PKC could alter the shape or position of the ATP dose–response relation to allow channel activity over the range of physiological (mM) ATP concentrations.
KATP channels are expressed in many tissues, and Kir6.x subunits are the pore-forming subunits that associate with different isoforms of the SUR protein to constitute the various KATP subtypes that are characteristic of different tissues and organelles (1–3). The amino acid sequence of Kir6.2, including the phosphorylation site, is also highly conserved among several mammalian species. The implications of KATP channel regulation by PKC for ischemic preconditioning are potentially important, but the details remain open to vigorous debate and investigation (12, 13, 27). For example, the relative importance of sarcolemmal vs. mitochondrial KATP channels in the process of ischemic preconditioning mediated by PKC is still unresolved (28, 29). The homologous PKC consensus site is also highly conserved in Kir6.1, which may form the pore of smooth muscle (30) and mitochondrial (31) isoforms of the KATP channel. However, the molecular basis for the inhibitory effects of PKC on the smooth-muscle KATP channel isoform remains to be investigated. Activation of PKC has been linked specifically to the protective role of mitochondrial KATP channels (13, 32). Thus, the site of modulation by PKC that we have identified may provide a common mechanism for the up- or down-regulation of several isoforms of the KATP channel, with wide implications under both physiological and pathological conditions.
Acknowledgments
We are most grateful to Drs. Lydia Aguilar-Bryan and Joseph Bryan, Baylor College of Medicine, and to Dr. Susumu Seino, Chiba University School of Medicine, for providing the clones used as a basis for this work. We thank Drs. J. Lytton, C. Miller, and C. Morris for critically reading drafts of the manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MRC; to R.J.F., M.P.W., and Dr. W. R. Giles), the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), and the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA). R.J.F. is an AHFMR Medical Scientist and MRC Distinguished Scientist. M.P.W. is an AHFMR Medical Scientist. P.E.L. was supported by an operating grant from the CDA, in honor of Gordon Russell Hodgson.
Abbreviations
- KATP channel
ATP-sensitive potassium channel
- PMA
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
- PDD
phorbol 12,13-didecanoate
- PKC
protein kinase C
- SUR
sulfonylurea receptor
- Kir6
inwardly rectifying K+ channel
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Article published online before print: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.160068997.
Article and publication date are at www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.160068997
References
- 1.Seino S. Annu Rev Physiol. 1999;61:337–362. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Babenko A P, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:667–687. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J. Endocr Rev. 1999;20:101–135. doi: 10.1210/edrv.20.2.0361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Inagaki N, Gonoi T, Clement J P, IV, Namba N, Inazawa J, Gonzalez G, Aguilar Bryan L, Seino S, Bryan J. Science. 1995;270:1166–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Inagaki N, Gonoi T, Clement J P, IV, Wang C-Z, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J, Seino S. Neuron. 1996;16:1011–1017. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80124-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tucker S J, Gribble F, Zhao C, Trapp S, Ashcroft F M. Nature (London) 1997;387:179–182. doi: 10.1038/387179a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Levitan I B. Annu Rev Physiol. 1994;56:193–212. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.56.030194.001205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gadsby D C, Nairne A C. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:S77–S107. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.1.S77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Light P E. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1286:65–73. doi: 10.1016/0304-4157(96)00004-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cheng S H, Rich D P, Marshall J, Gregory R J, Welsh M J, Smith A E. Cell. 1991;66:1027–1036. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90446-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Picciotto M R, Cohn J A, Bertuzzi G, Greengard P, Nairn A C. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:12742–12752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brooks G, Hearse D J. Circ Res. 1996;79:627–630. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.3.628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sato T, O'Rourke B, Marban E. Circ Res. 1998;83:110–114. doi: 10.1161/01.res.83.1.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dunne M J. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:C501–C506. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1994.267.2.C501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Horn R, Marty A. J Gen Physiol. 1988;92:145–149. doi: 10.1085/jgp.92.2.145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Light P E, Sabir A A, Allen B G, Walsh M P, French R J. Circ Res. 1996;79:399–406. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.3.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cornwell T L, Pryswansky K B, Wyatt T A, Lincoln T M. Mol Pharmacol. 1991;40:923–931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kikkawa U, Minakuchi R, Inohara S, Nishizuka Y. Methods Enzymol. 1983;99:288–298. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)99064-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cohen P. Annu Rev Biochem. 1989;58:453–508. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.58.070189.002321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hebert J M, Augereau J M, Gleye J, Maffrand J P. Biophys Res Commun. 1990;172:993–999. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(90)91544-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trapp S, Proks P, Tucker S J, Ashcroft F M. J Gen Physiol. 1998;112:333–349. doi: 10.1085/jgp.112.3.333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kemp B E, Pearson R B. Trends Biochem Sci. 1990;15:342–346. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90073-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shyng S-L, Nichols C G. Science. 1998;282:1138–1141. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baukrowitz T, Schulte U, Oliver D, Herlitze S, Krauter T, Tucker S J, Ruppersberg J P, Fakler B. Science. 1998;282:1141–1144. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.House C, Kemp B E. Science. 1987;238:1726–1728. doi: 10.1126/science.3686012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Beguin P, Nagashima K, Nishimura M, Gonoi T, Seino S. EMBO J. 1999;18:4722–4732. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.17.4722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simkhovich B Z, Przyklenk K, Kloner R A. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;40:9–28. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu Y, Sato T, O'Rourke B, Marban E. Circulation. 1998;97:2463–2469. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.97.24.2463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gross G J, Fryer R M. Circ Res. 1999;84:973–979. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.9.973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yokoshiki H, Sunagawa M, Seki T, Sperelakis N. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:C25–C37. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1998.274.1.C25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Suzuki M, Kotake K, Fujikura K, Inagaki N, Suzuki T, Gonoi T, Seino S, Takata K. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;241:693–697. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang T, Hirai K, Ashraf M. Circ Res. 1999;85:731–741. doi: 10.1161/01.res.85.8.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]