Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1993 Feb;52(2):354–361.

Distribution of lod scores under uncertain mode of inheritance.

C J MacLean 1, D T Bishop 1, S L Sherman 1, S R Diehl 1
PMCID: PMC1682196  PMID: 8430696

Abstract

We consider probability distributions of alternative lod statistics, differing in their treatment of segregation parameters when mode of inheritance is uncertain. A particular pedigree structure and a dominant genetic system displaying incomplete penetrance are analyzed. Lod scores calculated assuming an incorrect segregation model appear to conform quite well to the chi 2 distribution in the absence of linkage. In the presence of linkage, some power is lost. However, if lod scores are calculated under several different segregation models and the best one is accepted, opportunity for chance occurrence of high lod scores is enhanced. The distribution is still chi 2, but with extra degrees of freedom. These results hold over a wide range of sample sizes and segregation models, including small samples and low levels of penetrance.

Full text

PDF
354

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blackwelder W. C., Elston R. C. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1985;2(1):85–97. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370020109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clerget-Darpoux F., Babron M. C., Bonaïti-Pellié C. Assessing the effect of multiple linkage tests in complex diseases. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(4):245–253. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clerget-Darpoux F., Bonaïti-Pellié C., Hochez J. Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis. Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):393–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenberg D. A. Inferring mode of inheritance by comparison of lod scores. Am J Med Genet. 1989 Dec;34(4):480–486. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320340406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MORTON N. E. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet. 1955 Sep;7(3):277–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MacLean C. J., Morton N. E., Yee S. Combined analysis of genetic segregation and linkage under an oligogenic model. Comput Biomed Res. 1984 Oct;17(5):471–480. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(84)90013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ott J. Computer-simulation methods in human linkage analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(11):4175–4178. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.4175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Risch N. Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type I diabetes. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Mar;36(2):363–386. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Terwilliger J. D., Ott J. A multisample bootstrap approach to the estimation of maximized-over-models lod score distributions. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1992;59(2-3):142–144. doi: 10.1159/000133228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weeks D. E., Lehner T., Squires-Wheeler E., Kaufmann C., Ott J. Measuring the inflation of the lod score due to its maximization over model parameter values in human linkage analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(4):237–243. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Williamson J. A., Amos C. I. On the asymptotic behavior of the estimate of the recombination fraction under the null hypothesis of no linkage when the model is misspecified. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(5):309–318. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES