Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
letter
. 1993 Feb;52(2):441–442.

The transmission probability model is useful to prevent false inference.

F Demenais, M Martinez, N Andrieu
PMCID: PMC1682207  PMID: 8430705

Full text

PDF
441

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrieu N., Demenais F., Martinez M. Genetic analysis of human breast cancer: implications for family study designs. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(4):225–233. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370050404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Demenais F. M., Elston R. C. A general transmission probability model for pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1981;31(2):93–99. doi: 10.1159/000153185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Demenais F. M., Murigande C., Bonney G. E. Search for faster methods of fitting the regressive models to quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1990;7(5):319–334. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370070503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Demenais F., Abel L. Robustness of the unified model to shared environmental effects in the analysis of dichotomous traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):229–234. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370060140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Demenais F., Lathrop M., Lalouel J. M. Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):228–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dizier M. H., Bonaiti-Pellié C., Clerget-Darpoux F. POINTER correctly estimates the transmission probabilities under the general transmission model in the case of incomplete selection. Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Dec;51(6):1449–1450. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Elston R. C., Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1971;21(6):523–542. doi: 10.1159/000152448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Iselius L., Littler M., Morton N. Transmission of breast cancer--a controversy resolved. Clin Genet. 1992 Apr;41(4):211–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1992.tb03665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iselius L., Morton N. E. Transmission probabilities are not correctly implemented in the computer program POINTER. Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Aug;49(2):459–459. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lalouel J. M., Rao D. C., Morton N. E., Elston R. C. A unified model for complex segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):816–826. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McGuffin P., Huckle P. Simulation of Mendelism revisited: the recessive gene for attending medical school. Am J Hum Genet. 1990 May;46(5):994–999. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Morton N. E., MacLean C. J. Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Jul;26(4):489–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES