Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1996 Dec;62(12):4499–4503. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.12.4499-4503.1996

Use of potassium depletion to assess adaptation of ruminal bacteria to ionophores.

R P Lana 1, J B Russell 1
PMCID: PMC168276  PMID: 8953721

Abstract

When mixed ruminal bacteria from cattle fed timothy hay were suspended in a medium containing a low concentration of potassium, monensin and lasalocid catalyzed a rapid depletion of potassium from cells. The ionophore-mediated potassium depletion was concentration dependent, and it was possible to describe the relationship with saturation constants. Mixed ruminal bacteria never lost more than 50% of their potassium (Kmax = 46%), and the concentrations of monensin and lasalocid needed to cause half-maximal potassium depletion (Kd) were 178 and 141 nM, respectively. When cattle were fed 350 mg of monensin per day, the ratio of ruminal acetate to propionate decreased from 4.2 to 2.9, and the Kd of monensin was eightfold greater than the value for mixed ruminal bacteria from control animals. Monensin supplementation also caused a twofold increase in the Kd of lasalocid. Lasalocid supplementation (350 mg per day) had no effect on the ruminal acetate-to-propionate ratio, but it caused a twofold increase in the Kd values of monensin and lasalocid. Increases in Kd occurred almost immediately after ionophore was added to the ration, and the Kd values returned to their prefeeding values within 14 days of withdrawal. Ionophore supplementation had no effect on the Kmax values, and approximately 50% of the population was always highly ionophore resistant. Because the Kd values of even adapted ruminal bacteria were low (< 1.5 microM), it appears that a large proportion of the ruminal ionophore is bound nonselectively to feed particles or ionophore-resistant bacteria.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergen W. G., Bates D. B. Ionophores: their effect on production efficiency and mode of action. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1465–1483. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861465x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen M., Wolin M. J. Effect of monensin and lasalocid-sodium on the growth of methanogenic and rumen saccharolytic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Jul;38(1):72–77. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.1.72-77.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chow J. M., Russell J. B. Effect of ionophores and pH on growth of Streptococcus bovis in batch and continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 Jun;56(6):1588–1593. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.6.1588-1593.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chow J. M., Van Kessel J. A., Russell J. B. Binding of radiolabeled monensin and lasalocid to ruminal microorganisms and feed. J Anim Sci. 1994 Jun;72(6):1630–1635. doi: 10.2527/1994.7261630x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dawson K. A., Boling J. A. Monensin-resistant bacteria in the rumens of calves on monensin-containing and unmedicated diets. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1983 Jul;46(1):160–164. doi: 10.1128/aem.46.1.160-164.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dennis S. M., Nagaraja T. G., Bartley E. E. Effects of lasalocid or monensin on lactate-producing or -using rumen bacteria. J Anim Sci. 1981 Feb;52(2):418–426. doi: 10.2527/jas1981.522418x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donius D. A., Simpson M. E., Marsh P. B. Effect of monensin fed with forage on digestion and the ruminal ecosystem of steers. J Anim Sci. 1976 Jan;42(1):229–234. doi: 10.2527/jas1976.421229x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goodrich R. D., Garrett J. E., Gast D. R., Kirick M. A., Larson D. A., Meiske J. C. Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. J Anim Sci. 1984 Jun;58(6):1484–1498. doi: 10.2527/jas1984.5861484x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Krause D. O., Russell J. B. How many ruminal bacteria are there? J Dairy Sci. 1996 Aug;79(8):1467–1475. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76506-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. LOWRY O. H., ROSEBROUGH N. J., FARR A. L., RANDALL R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morehead M. C., Dawson K. A. Some growth and metabolic characteristics of monensin-sensitive and monensin-resistant strains of Prevotella (Bacteroides) ruminicola. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 May;58(5):1617–1623. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.5.1617-1623.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nagaraja T. G., Avery T. B., Bartley E. E., Roof S. K., Dayton A. D. Effect of lasalocid, monensin or thiopeptin on lactic acidosis in cattle. J Anim Sci. 1982 Mar;54(3):649–658. doi: 10.2527/jas1982.543649x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nagaraja T. G., Taylor M. B. Susceptibility and resistance of ruminal bacteria to antimicrobial feed additives. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Jul;53(7):1620–1625. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.7.1620-1625.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pressman B. C. Biological applications of ionophores. Annu Rev Biochem. 1976;45:501–530. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.45.070176.002441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reffett-Stabel J., Spears J. W., Harvey R. W., Lucas D. M. Salinomycin and lasalocid effects on growth rate, mineral metabolism and ruminal fermentation in steers. J Anim Sci. 1989 Oct;67(10):2735–2742. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.67102735x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Russell J. B. A proposed mechanism of monensin action in inhibiting ruminal bacterial growth: effects on ion flux and protonmotive force. J Anim Sci. 1987 May;64(5):1519–1525. doi: 10.2527/jas1987.6451519x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Russell J. B., Strobel H. J. Effect of ionophores on ruminal fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jan;55(1):1–6. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.1.1-6.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Russell J. B., Strobel H. J. Effects of additives on in vitro ruminal fermentation: a comparison of monensin and bacitracin, another gram-positive antibiotic. J Anim Sci. 1988 Feb;66(2):552–558. doi: 10.2527/jas1988.662552x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schwingel W. R., Bates D. B., Denham S. C., Beede D. K. Lasalocid-catalyzed proton conductance in Streptococcus bovis as affected by extracellular potassium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jan;55(1):259–260. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.1.259-260.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Stahl D. A., Flesher B., Mansfield H. R., Montgomery L. Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 May;54(5):1079–1084. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.5.1079-1084.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strobel H. J., Russell J. B. Non-proton-motive-force-dependent sodium efflux from the ruminal bacterium Streptococcus bovis: bound versus free pools. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Oct;55(10):2664–2668. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.10.2664-2668.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES