Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1992 Oct;51(4):859–870.

Inter- and intrafamilial heterogeneity: effective sampling strategies and comparison of analysis methods.

M Durner 1, D A Greenberg 1, S E Hodge 1
PMCID: PMC1682807  PMID: 1415227

Abstract

Heterogeneity, both inter- and intrafamilial, represents a serious problem in linkage studies of common complex diseases. In this study we simulated different scenarios with families who phenotypically have identical diseases but who genotypically have two different forms of the disease (both forms genetic). We examined the proportion of families displaying intrafamilial heterogeneity, as a function of mode of inheritance, gene frequency, penetrance, and sampling strategies. Furthermore, we compared two different ways of analyzing linkage in these data sets: a two-locus (2L) analysis versus a one-locus (SL) analysis combined with an admixture test. Data were simulated with tight linkage between one disease locus and a marker locus; the other disease locus was not linked to a marker. Our findings are as follows: (1) In contrast to what has been proposed elsewhere to minimize heterogeneity, sampling only "high-density" pedigrees will increase the proportion of families with intrafamilial heterogeneity, especially when the two forms are relatively close in frequency. (2) When one form is dominant and one is recessive, this sampling strategy will greatly decrease the proportions of families with a recessive form and may therefore make it more difficult to detect linkage to the recessive form. (3) An SL analysis combined with an admixture test achieves about the same lod scores and estimate of the recombination fraction as does a 2L analysis. Also, a 2L analysis of a sample of families with intrafamilial heterogeneity does not perform significantly better than an SL analysis. (4) Bilineal pedigrees have little effect on the mean maximum lod score and mean maximum recombination fraction, and therefore there is little danger that including these families will lead to a false exclusion of linkage.

Full text

PDF
859

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cavalli-Sforza L. L., King M. C. Detecting linkage for genetically heterogeneous diseases and detecting heterogeneity with linkage data. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 May;38(5):599–616. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Durner M., Greenberg D. A. Effect of heterogeneity and assumed mode of inheritance on lod scores. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Feb 1;42(3):271–275. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320420302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egeland J. A., Gerhard D. S., Pauls D. L., Sussex J. N., Kidd K. K., Allen C. R., Hostetter A. M., Housman D. E. Bipolar affective disorders linked to DNA markers on chromosome 11. 1987 Feb 26-Mar 4Nature. 325(6107):783–787. doi: 10.1038/325783a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldin L. R. Detection of linkage under heterogeneity: comparison of the two-locus vs. admixture models. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):61–66. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goldin L. R., Martinez M. M., Gershon E. S. Sampling strategies for linkage studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1991;240(3):182–187. doi: 10.1007/BF02190761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenberg D. A. Simulation studies of segregation analysis: application to two-locus models. Am J Hum Genet. 1984 Jan;36(1):167–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hodge S. E., Anderson C. E., Neiswanger K., Sparkes R. S., Rimoin D. L. The search for heterogeneity in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM): linkage studies, two-locus models, and genetic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Nov;35(6):1139–1155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelsoe J. R., Ginns E. I., Egeland J. A., Gerhard D. S., Goldstein A. M., Bale S. J., Pauls D. L., Long R. T., Kidd K. K., Conte G. Re-evaluation of the linkage relationship between chromosome 11p loci and the gene for bipolar affective disorder in the Old Order Amish. Nature. 1989 Nov 16;342(6247):238–243. doi: 10.1038/342238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kennedy J. L., Giuffra L. A., Moises H. W., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Pakstis A. J., Kidd J. R., Castiglione C. M., Sjogren B., Wetterberg L., Kidd K. K. Evidence against linkage of schizophrenia to markers on chromosome 5 in a northern Swedish pedigree. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):167–170. doi: 10.1038/336167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lander E. S. Splitting schizophrenia. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):105–106. doi: 10.1038/336105a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MORTON N. E. The detection and estimation of linkage between the genes for elliptocytosis and the Rh blood type. Am J Hum Genet. 1956 Jun;8(2):80–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Martinez M. M., Goldin L. R. The detection of linkage and heterogeneity in nuclear families for complex disorders: one versus two marker loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1989 Apr;44(4):552–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Merikangas K. R., Spence M. A., Kupfer D. J. Linkage studies of bipolar disorder: methodologic and analytic issues. Report of MacArthur Foundation Workshop on Linkage and Clinical Features in Affective Disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Dec;46(12):1137–1141. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810120079012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ott J. Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Sep;26(5):588–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. SMITH C. A. TESTING FOR HETEROGENEITY OF RECOMBINATION FRACTION VALUES IN HUMAN GENETICS. Ann Hum Genet. 1963 Nov;27:175–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1963.tb00210.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sherrington R., Brynjolfsson J., Petursson H., Potter M., Dudleston K., Barraclough B., Wasmuth J., Dobbs M., Gurling H. Localization of a susceptibility locus for schizophrenia on chromosome 5. Nature. 1988 Nov 10;336(6195):164–167. doi: 10.1038/336164a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vieland V. J., Hodge S. E., Greenberg D. A. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):45–59. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES