Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Jan;63(1):1–6. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.1.1-6.1997

Use of sulfite and hydrogen peroxide to control bacterial contamination in ethanol fermentation.

I S Chang 1, B H Kim 1, P K Shin 1
PMCID: PMC168295  PMID: 8979332

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria isolated from an industrial-scale ethanol fermentation process were used to evaluate sulfite as a bacterial-contamination control agent in a cell-recycled continuous ethanol fermentation process. The viabilities of bacteria were decreased by sulfite at concentrations of 100 to 400 mg liter-1, while sulfite at the same concentrations did not change the viability of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain used in this process. Sulfite was effective only in the presence of oxygen. Bacteria showed differences in their susceptibilities to sulfite. Facultatively heterofermentative Lactobacillus casei 4-3 was more susceptible than was obligatory heterofermentative Lactobacillus fermentum 7-1. The former showed higher enzyme activities involved in the production and consumption of hydrogen peroxide than did the latter. The viability of L. fermentum 7-1 could be selectively controlled by hydrogen peroxide at concentrations of 1 to 10 mM. Based on these findings, it is hypothesized that the sulfur trioxide radical anions formed by peroxidase in the presence of hydrogen peroxide are responsible for the control of contaminating bacteria. Sulfite did not kill the yeast strain, which has catalase to degrade hydrogen peroxide. A cell-recycled continuous ethanol fermentation process was run successfully with sulfite treatments.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AQUARONE E. Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. Appl Microbiol. 1960 Sep;8:263–268. doi: 10.1128/am.8.5.263-268.1960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aust S. D., Chignell C. F., Bray T. M., Kalyanaraman B., Mason R. P. Free radicals in toxicology. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1993 Jun;120(2):168–178. doi: 10.1006/taap.1993.1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. EICHEL H. J., REM L. T. Respiratory enzyme studies in Tetrahymena pyriformis. V. Some properties of an L-lactic oxidase. J Biol Chem. 1962 Mar;237:940–945. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gunnison A. F. Sulphite toxicity: a critical review of in vitro and in vivo data. Food Cosmet Toxicol. 1981 Oct;19(5):667–682. doi: 10.1016/0015-6264(81)90519-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hayatsu H., Miller R. C., Jr The cleavage of DNA by the oxygen-dependent reaction of bisulfite. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972 Jan 14;46(1):120–124. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(72)90638-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Higuchi M., Shimada M., Yamamoto Y., Hayashi T., Koga T., Kamio Y. Identification of two distinct NADH oxidases corresponding to H2O2-forming oxidase and H2O-forming oxidase induced in Streptococcus mutans. J Gen Microbiol. 1993 Oct;139(10):2343–2351. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-10-2343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Koditschek L. K., Umbreit W. W. Alpha-glycerophosphate oxidase in Streptococcus faecium F 24. J Bacteriol. 1969 Jun;98(3):1063–1068. doi: 10.1128/jb.98.3.1063-1068.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ma M., Eaton J. W. Multicellular oxidant defense in unicellular organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):7924–7928. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.7924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mason R. P., Stolze K., Flitter W. D. Free radical reactions with DNA and its nucleotides. Basic Life Sci. 1990;52:119–125. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9561-8_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McCord J. M., Fridovich I. The utility of superoxide dismutase in studying free radical reactions. I. Radicals generated by the interaction of sulfite, dimethyl sulfoxide, and oxygen. J Biol Chem. 1969 Nov 25;244(22):6056–6063. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Modderman J. P. Technological aspects of use of sulfiting agents in food. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1986 Jan-Feb;69(1):1–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mottley C., Mason R. P., Chignell C. F., Sivarajah K., Eling T. E. The formation of sulfur trioxide radical anion during the prostaglandin hydroperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation of bisulfite (hydrated sulfur dioxide). J Biol Chem. 1982 May 10;257(9):5050–5055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mottley C., Mason R. P. Sulfate anion free radical formation by the peroxidation of (Bi)sulfite and its reaction with hydroxyl radical scavengers. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1988 Dec;267(2):681–689. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90077-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mottley C., Trice T. B., Mason R. P. Direct detection of the sulfur trioxide radical anion during the horseradish peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide oxidation of sulfite (aqueous sulfur dioxide). Mol Pharmacol. 1982 Nov;22(3):732–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Neta P., Huie R. E. Free-radical chemistry of sulfite. Environ Health Perspect. 1985 Dec;64:209–217. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8564209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Yang S. F. Destruction of tryptophan during the aerobic oxidation of sulfite ions. Environ Res. 1973 Dec;6(4):395–402. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(73)90055-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES