Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Jan;63(1):7–12. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.1.7-12.1997

Mitochondrial DNA loss caused by ethanol in Saccharomyces flor yeasts.

J I Ibeas 1, J Jimenez 1
PMCID: PMC168296  PMID: 8979333

Abstract

Saccharomyces flor yeasts proliferate at the surface of sherry wine, which contains over 15% (vol) ethanol. Since ethanol is a powerful inducer of respiration-deficient mutants, this alcohol has been proposed to be the source of the high diversity found in the mitochondrial genomes of flor yeasts and other wine yeasts. Southern blot analysis suggests that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphic changes are due to minor lesions in the mitochondrial genome. As determined in this work by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, restriction analysis, and Southern blot analysis, ethanol-induced petite mutants completely lack mtDNA (rho zero). Ethanol-induced changes in the mitochondrial genome that could explain the observed mtDNA polymorphism in flor yeasts were not found. The transfer of two different mtDNA variants from flor yeasts to a laboratory strain conferred in both cases an increase in ethanol tolerance in the recipient strain, suggesting that mtDNAs are probably subjected to positive selection pressure concerning their ability to confer ethanol tolerance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (470.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguilera A., Benítez T. Role of mitochondria in ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch Microbiol. 1985 Sep;142(4):389–392. doi: 10.1007/BF00491909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandas E. L., Zakharov I. A. Induction of rho- mutations in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ethanol. Mutat Res. 1980 Jul;71(2):193–199. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(80)90070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bidenne C., Blondin B., Dequin S., Vezinhet F. Analysis of the chromosomal DNA polymorphism of wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1992 Jul;22(1):1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00351734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cadotte M., Allard S., Verdy M. Lack of effect of ethanol in vitro on human chromosomes. Ann Genet. 1973 Mar;16(1):55–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Conde J., Fink G. R. A mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae defective for nuclear fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3651–3655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ferguson L. R., von Borstel R. C. Induction of the cytoplasmic 'petite' mutation by chemical and physical agents in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1992 Jan;265(1):103–148. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(92)90042-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heude M. The induction of rho- mutants by UV or gamma-rays is independent of the nuclear recombinational repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res. 1988 Sep;194(2):151–163. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(88)90017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ibeas J. I., Jimenez J. Electrophoretic karyotype of budding yeasts with intact cell wall. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Aug 11;21(16):3902–3902. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.16.3902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ibeas J. I., Lozano I., Perdigones F., Jimenez J. Detection of Dekkera-Brettanomyces strains in sherry by a nested PCR method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996 Mar;62(3):998–1003. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.3.998-1003.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiménez J., Benítez T. Yeast cell viability under conditions of high temperature and ethanol concentrations depends on the mitochondrial genome. Curr Genet. 1988 Jun;13(6):461–469. doi: 10.1007/BF02427751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jiménez J., Longo E., Benítez T. Induction of petite yeast mutants by membrane-active agents. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3126–3132. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.12.3126-3132.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Laffan J., Firshein W. DNA replication by a DNA-membrane complex extracted from Bacillus subtilis: site of initiation in vitro and initiation potential of subcomplexes. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jun;169(6):2819–2827. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.6.2819-2827.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martínez P., Codón A. C., Pérez L., Benítez T. Physiological and molecular characterization of flor yeasts: polymorphism of flor yeast populations. Yeast. 1995 Nov;11(14):1399–1411. doi: 10.1002/yea.320111408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pina A., Calderón I. L., Benítez T. Intergeneric hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zygosaccharomyces fermentati obtained by protoplast fusion. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 May;51(5):995–1003. doi: 10.1128/aem.51.5.995-1003.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Querol A., Barrio E., Huerta T., Ramón D. Molecular monitoring of wine fermentations conducted by active dry yeast strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Sep;58(9):2948–2953. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.9.2948-2953.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ristow H., Seyfarth A., Lochmann E. R. Chromosomal damages by ethanol and acetaldehyde in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as studied by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Mutat Res. 1995 Feb;326(2):165–170. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. de Zamaroczy M., Bernardi G. The primary structure of the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae--a review. Gene. 1986;47(2-3):155–177. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90060-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES