Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1990 Sep;47(3):470–482.

Monte Carlo comparison of preliminary methods for ordering multiple genetic loci.

J M Olson 1, M Boehnke 1
PMCID: PMC1683878  PMID: 2393021

Abstract

We carried out a simulation study to compare the power of eight methods for preliminary ordering of multiple genetic loci. Using linkage groups of six loci and a simple pedigree structure, we considered the effects on method performance of locus informativity, interlocus spacing, total distance along the chromosome, and sample size. Method performance was assessed using the mean rank of the true order, the proportion of replicates in which the true order was the best order, and the number of orders that needed to be considered for subsequent multipoint linkage analysis in order to include the true order with high probability. A new method which maximizes the sum of adjacent two-point maximum lod scores divided by the equivalent number of informative meioses and the previously described method which minimizes the sum of adjacent recombination fraction estimates were found to be the best overall locus-ordering methods for the situations considered, although several other methods also performed well.

Full text

PDF
470

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Botstein D., White R. L., Skolnick M., Davis R. W. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buetow K. H., Chakravarti A. Multipoint gene mapping using seriation. I. General methods. Am J Hum Genet. 1987 Aug;41(2):180–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buetow K. H., Chakravarti A. Multipoint gene mapping using seriation. II. Analysis of simulated and empirical data. Am J Hum Genet. 1987 Aug;41(2):189–201. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Donis-Keller H., Green P., Helms C., Cartinhour S., Weiffenbach B., Stephens K., Keith T. P., Bowden D. W., Smith D. R., Lander E. S. A genetic linkage map of the human genome. Cell. 1987 Oct 23;51(2):319–337. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards J. H. The analysis of X-linkage. Ann Hum Genet. 1971 Feb;34(3):229–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1971.tb00237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kammerer C. M., MacCluer J. W. Empirical power of three preliminary methods for ordering loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Dec;43(6):964–970. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lathrop G. M., Lalouel J. M., Julier C., Ott J. Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jun;81(11):3443–3446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.11.3443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weeks D. E., Lange K. Preliminary ranking procedures for multilocus ordering. Genomics. 1987 Nov;1(3):236–242. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(87)90050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wilson S. R. A major simplification in the preliminary ordering of linked loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1988;5(2):75–80. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370050203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES