Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Apr;63(4):1588–1593. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.4.1588-1593.1997

On-farm monitoring of mouse-invasive Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis and a model for its association with the production of contaminated eggs.

J Guard-Petter 1, D J Henzler 1, M M Rahman 1, R W Carlson 1
PMCID: PMC168450  PMID: 9097453

Abstract

Mice (Mus musculus) captured in henhouses were assessed for the presence of salmonellae in spleens. Of 621 and 526 spleens cultured during the first and second years of collection, 25.0 and 17.9%, respectively, were positive for Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Contaminated eggs were cultured from nine houses during the first year of sampling, and for eight of these houses, serovar Enteritidis was recovered from the spleens of mice. Rank sum statistical analysis of positive mouse spleens indicated that three overlapping bacterial populations were present. This pattern of infection was repeated when lipopolysaccharide (LPS) variants were used to infect chicks, and the worst infections were associated with isolates producing high-molecular-weight (HMW) LPS. Mouse isolates were capable of producing unprecedented amounts of HMW LPS as indicated by compositional analysis of six isolates that swarmed across 2% agar, which is a type of bacterial migration dependent upon production of HMW LPS. It is suggested that serovar Enteritidis cultured from the spleens of mice caught on farms will detect strains that are enhanced in their ability to contaminate eggs, in part because they are able to produce HMW LPS.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (310.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison C., Emödy L., Coleman N., Hughes C. The role of swarm cell differentiation and multicellular migration in the uropathogenicity of Proteus mirabilis. J Infect Dis. 1994 May;169(5):1155–1158. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.5.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gast R. K. Research note: evaluation of direct plating for detecting Salmonella enteritidis in pools of egg contents. Poult Sci. 1993 Aug;72(8):1611–1614. doi: 10.3382/ps.0721611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guard-Petter J., Keller L. H., Rahman M. M., Carlson R. W., Silvers S. A novel relationship between O-antigen variation, matrix formation, and invasiveness of Salmonella enteritidis. Epidemiol Infect. 1996 Oct;117(2):219–231. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800001394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Guard-Petter J., Lakshmi B., Carlson R., Ingram K. Characterization of lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity in Salmonella enteritidis by an improved gel electrophoresis method. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Aug;61(8):2845–2851. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.8.2845-2851.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hellerqvist C. G., Lindberg B., Svensson S., Holme T., Lindberg A. A. Structural studies on the O-specific side chains of the cell wall lipopolysaccharides from Salmonella typhi and S. enteritidis. Acta Chem Scand. 1969;23(5):1588–1596. doi: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.23-1588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Henzler D. J., Ebel E., Sanders J., Kradel D., Mason J. Salmonella enteritidis in eggs from commercial chicken layer flocks implicated in human outbreaks. Avian Dis. 1994 Jan-Mar;38(1):37–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Henzler D. J., Opitz H. M. The role of mice in the epizootiology of Salmonella enteritidis infection on chicken layer farms. Avian Dis. 1992 Jul-Sep;36(3):625–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Higgins N. P., Yang X., Fu Q., Roth J. R. Surveying a supercoil domain by using the gamma delta resolution system in Salmonella typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 1996 May;178(10):2825–2835. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.10.2825-2835.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Humphrey T. J., Whitehead A., Gawler A. H., Henley A., Rowe B. Numbers of Salmonella enteritidis in the contents of naturally contaminated hens' eggs. Epidemiol Infect. 1991 Jun;106(3):489–496. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800067546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Humphrey T. J., Williams A., McAlpine K., Lever M. S., Guard-Petter J., Cox J. M. Isolates of Salmonella enterica Enteritidis PT4 with enhanced heat and acid tolerance are more virulent in mice and more invasive in chickens. Epidemiol Infect. 1996 Aug;117(1):79–88. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800001151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keller L. H., Benson C. E., Krotec K., Eckroade R. J. Salmonella enteritidis colonization of the reproductive tract and forming and freshly laid eggs of chickens. Infect Immun. 1995 Jul;63(7):2443–2449. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.7.2443-2449.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lenski R. E., Travisano M. Dynamics of adaptation and diversification: a 10,000-generation experiment with bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6808–6814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mishu B., Koehler J., Lee L. A., Rodrigue D., Brenner F. H., Blake P., Tauxe R. V. Outbreaks of Salmonella enteritidis infections in the United States, 1985-1991. J Infect Dis. 1994 Mar;169(3):547–552. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.3.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petter J. G. Detection of two smooth colony phenotypes in a Salmonella enteritidis isolate which vary in their ability to contaminate eggs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993 Sep;59(9):2884–2890. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.9.2884-2890.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacks J. M., Bolin S. R., Crowder S. V. Prevalence estimation from pooled samples. Am J Vet Res. 1989 Feb;50(2):205–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES