Skip to main content
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1986 Apr;38(4):582–589.

Some fallacious thinking about the paternity index.

J Valentin
PMCID: PMC1684792  PMID: 3706304

Full text

PDF
582

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chakravarti A., Li C. C. Estimating the prior probability of paternity from the results of exclusion tests. Forensic Sci Int. 1984 Feb;24(2):143–147. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(84)90094-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hummel K., Conradt J. Calculation of percentage of cases on file with an unnamed father in 100 one-man and 100 two-man cases (filiation cases) from South-West Germany in 1976-1981. Ratio of defendants to witnesses among non-excluded men in two-man cases. Z Rechtsmed. 1982;88(4):277–284. doi: 10.1007/BF00198663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hummel K. Eine weitere Art A-priori-Wahrscheinlichkeit zur Ermittlung der Irrtumserwartung aus Vaterschaftsplausibilitäten bei Mehrmannfällen. Z Immunitatsforsch Allerg Klin Immunol. 1970 Jul;140(1):115–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li C. C., Chakravarti A. Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. Am J Hum Genet. 1985 Jul;37(4):809–818. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Valentin J. Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):420–431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES