Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1982 Nov;34(6):988–998.

Neural tube defects among twin births.

G C Windham, L E Sever
PMCID: PMC1685707  PMID: 7180853

Abstract

To obtain accurate, unbiased rates of neural tube defects (NTDs) in twins, we conducted a population-based study that included live births and fetal deaths in Los Angeles County, California, ascertaining cases by multiple methods. Twenty-eight twin cases yielded a prevalence-at-birth of 1.6/1,000 twin births, which is significantly higher than the singleton prevalence of 1.1/1,000 births. In twins compared with singletons, the prevalences of both encephalocele and anencephaly are increased, whereas spina bifida is decreased. The twin case male/female sex ratio (.55) is lower than the singleton case sex ratio (.77). Concordance is relatively low at 3.7%, but appears to be higher than recently reported recurrence risks in other low prevalence areas. Stillbirths were most common among female cases and like-sex twins. Our study tends to support proposed etiologic theories associating NTDs with females or monozygotic twins, or both. There is increasing evidence that the etiology of NTDs may differ in high and low prevalence areas. We suggest also that twins and singletons may differ in their response to etiologic factors. The variations among anencephaly, spina bifida, and encephalocele in their association with twinning suggest that there may be different factors that influence the development of each specific NTD. The noted differences among the malformations also indicate that some of the variation among results of other studies of NTDs and twinning may be due to case ascertainment. Including spina bifida cases would decrease the proportion of twins in a study population, while including anencephalics would increase the proportion. Importantly, ascertaining fetal deaths would increase the proportion of anencephalics and case females, so studies of NTDs that do not include fetal deaths will show fewer twins than expected. On the basis of our findings and those of Layde et al., excluding encephaloceles will also decrease the number of twins among NTD cases. When investigating etiologic hypotheses for NTDs, these potential biases must be recognized.

Full text

PDF
988

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buckley M. R., Erten O. The epidemiology of anencephaly and spina bifida in Izmir, Turkey, in the light of recent aetiological theories. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1979 Sep;33(3):186–190. doi: 10.1136/jech.33.3.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carter C. O., Evans K. Spina bifida and anencephalus in greater London. J Med Genet. 1973 Sep;10(3):209–234. doi: 10.1136/jmg.10.3.209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Emanuel I., Sever L. E. Questions concerning the possible association of potatoes and neural-tube defects, and an alternative hypothesis relating to maternal growth and development. Teratology. 1973 Dec;8(3):325–331. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420080315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Field B., Kerr C. Letter: Twinning and neural-tube defects. Lancet. 1974 Oct 19;2(7886):964–965. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91185-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Granroth G., Haapakoski J., Hakama M. Defects of the central nervous system in Finland. II. Birth order, outcome of previous pregnancies and family history. Teratology. 1978 Jun;17(3):213–222. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420170302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Granroth G., Hakama M., Saxén L. Defects of the central nervous system in Finland: I. Variations in time and space, sex distribution, and parental age. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1977 Sep;31(3):164–170. doi: 10.1136/jech.31.3.164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guha-Ray D. K. Anencephaly--survey of 60 cases. Pa Med. 1977 Jul;80(7):46–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hay S., Wehrung D. A. Congenital malformations in twins. Am J Hum Genet. 1970 Nov;22(6):662–678. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. James W. H. Differences between the events preceding spina bifida and anencephaly. J Med Genet. 1981 Feb;18(1):17–21. doi: 10.1136/jmg.18.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. James W. H. The sex ratio in anencephaly. J Med Genet. 1979 Apr;16(2):129–133. doi: 10.1136/jmg.16.2.129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. James W. H. Twinning and anencephaly. Ann Hum Biol. 1976 Sep;3(5):401–409. doi: 10.1080/03014467600001661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Janerich D. T., Piper J. Shifting genetic patterns in anencephaly and spina bifida. J Med Genet. 1978 Apr;15(2):101–105. doi: 10.1136/jmg.15.2.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Layde P. M., Erickson J. D., Falek A., McCarthy B. J. Congenital malformation in twins. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 Jan;32(1):69–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Leck I. Causation of neural tube defects: clues from epidemiology. Br Med Bull. 1974 May;30(2):158–163. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McBride M. L. Sib risk of anencephaly and spina bifida in British Columbia. Am J Med Genet. 1979;3(4):377–387. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320030409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Myrianthopoulos N. C. Congenital malformations: the contribution of twin studies. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1978;14(6A):151–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Renwick J. H. Hypothesis: anencephaly and spina bifida are usually preventable by avoidance of a specific but unidentified substance present in certain potato tubers. Br J Prev Soc Med. 1972 May;26(2):67–88. doi: 10.1136/jech.26.2.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schinzel A. A., Smith D. W., Miller J. R. Monozygotic twinning and structural defects. J Pediatr. 1979 Dec;95(6):921–930. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80278-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sever L. E. An epidemiologic study of neural tube defects in Los Angeles County II. Etiologic factors in an area with low prevalence at birth. Teratology. 1982 Jun;25(3):323–334. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420250309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sever L. E., Sanders M., Monsen R. An epidemiologic study of neural tube defects in Los Angeles County I. Prevalence at birth based on multiple sources of case ascertainment. Teratology. 1982 Jun;25(3):315–321. doi: 10.1002/tera.1420250308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yen S., MacMahon B. Genetics of anencephaly and spina bifida? Lancet. 1968 Sep 14;2(7568):623–626. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)90709-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES