Skip to main content
PMC home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Jul;63(7):2821–2825. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.7.2821-2825.1997

Nitrogen availability of grape juice limits killer yeast growth and fermentation activity during mixed-culture fermentation with sensitive commercial yeast strains.

K Medina 1, F M Carrau 1, O Gioia 1, N Bracesco 1
PMCID: PMC168579  PMID: 9212430

Abstract

The competition between selected or commercial killer strains of type K2 and sensitive commercial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was studied under various conditions in sterile grape juice fermentations. The focus of this study was the effect of yeast inoculation levels and the role of assimilable nitrogen nutrition on killer activity. A study of the consumption of free amino nitrogen (FAN) by pure and mixed cultures of killer and sensitive cells showed no differences between the profiles of nitrogen assimilation in all cases, and FAN was practically depleted in the first 2 days of fermentation. The effect of the addition of assimilable nitrogen and the size of inoculum was examined in mixed killer and sensitive strain competitions. Stuck and sluggish wine fermentations were observed to depend on nitrogen availability when the ratio of killer to sensitive cells was low (1:10 to 1:100). A relationship between the initial assimilable nitrogen content of must and the proportion of killer cells during fermentation was shown. An indirect relationship was found between inoculum size and the percentage of killer cells: a smaller inoculum resulted in a higher proportion of killer cells in grape juice fermentations. In all cases, wines obtained with pure-culture fermentations were preferred to mixed-culture fermentations by sensory analysis. The reasons why killer cells do not finish fermentation under competitive conditions with sensitive cells are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (204.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bussey H. Physiology of killer factor in yeast. Adv Microb Physiol. 1981;22:93–122. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60326-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cansado J., Longo E., Agrelo D., Villa T. G. Levaduras asociadas a procesos de fermentación espontánea en vinos de Ribeiro. Análisis del homo/heterotalismo y sistema killer de las cepas de S. cerevisiae. Microbiologia. 1989 Sep;5(2):79–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Esteban R., Wickner R. B. A new non-mendelian genetic element of yeast that increases cytopathology produced by M1 double-stranded RNA in ski strains. Genetics. 1987 Nov;117(3):399–408. doi: 10.1093/genetics/117.3.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heard G. M., Fleet G. H. Occurrence and Growth of Killer Yeasts during Wine Fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987 Sep;53(9):2171–2174. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.9.2171-2174.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiranek V., Langridge P., Henschke P. A. Regulation of hydrogen sulfide liberation in wine-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains by assimilable nitrogen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Feb;61(2):461–467. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.2.461-467.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lafon-Lafourcade S., Larue F., Ribereau-Gayon P. Evidence for the existence of "survival factors" as an explanation for some peculiarities of yeast growth, especially in grape must of high sugar concentration. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Dec;38(6):1069–1073. doi: 10.1128/aem.38.6.1069-1073.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lagunas R., Dominguez C., Busturia A., Sáez M. J. Mechanisms of appearance of the Pasteur effect in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: inactivation of sugar transport systems. J Bacteriol. 1982 Oct;152(1):19–25. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.1.19-25.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Petering J. E., Symons M. R., Langridge P., Henschke P. A. Determination of killer yeast activity in fermenting grape juice by using a marked Saccharomyces wine yeast strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Nov;57(11):3232–3236. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.11.3232-3236.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Polonelli L., Conti S., Gerloni M., Magliani W., Chezzi C., Morace G. Interfaces of the yeast killer phenomenon. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1991;18(1):47–87. doi: 10.3109/10408419109113509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosini G. The occurrence of killer characters in yeasts. Can J Microbiol. 1983 Oct;29(10):1462–1464. doi: 10.1139/m83-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Salmon J. M. Effect of Sugar Transport Inactivation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on Sluggish and Stuck Enological Fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Apr;55(4):953–958. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.4.953-958.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Seki T., Choi E. H., Ryu D. Construction of killer wine yeast strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 May;49(5):1211–1215. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1211-1215.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wickner R. B. Double-stranded RNA replication in yeast: the killer system. Annu Rev Biochem. 1986;55:373–395. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.55.070186.002105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES