Skip to main content
NCBI home page
American Journal of Human Genetics logoLink to American Journal of Human Genetics
. 1983 Nov;35(6):1307–1313.

Down syndrome rates and relaxed selection at older maternal ages.

E B Hook
PMCID: PMC1685993  PMID: 6228139

Abstract

Preferential survival in older mothers of fetuses with Down syndrome has been proposed as contributing to the maternal-age effect of this condition. If correct, this provocative hypothesis, which may be termed "relaxed selection," has major implications for approaches to prevention of Down syndrome live births in older women. Several predictions of this hypothesis are examined here by comparisons of parental ages among various populations. These revealed that: (1) mean maternal age of Down syndrome live births is slightly lower than that of Down syndrome spontaneous fetal deaths; (2) mean maternal age of those with mutant D/21 translocation Down syndrome is about the same as that of controls; (3) the ages of Down syndrome mothers who have Down syndrome live births is slightly lower than ages of Down syndrome mothers who have unaffected live births; and (4) in recent data on 47, +21 cases in which the extra chromosome 21 is of paternal origin, the mean maternal ages are 4-5 years lower than the maternal ages of cases of maternal origin (in contrast to earlier reports). All of these observations are contrary to the hypothesis that relaxed selection contributes significantly to the maternal-age association of Down syndrome. If there is any effect of relaxed selection, it is likely to be very weak and/or act primarily upon abortions that occur before recognition of pregnancy.

Full text

PDF
1307

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aymé S., Lippman-Hand A. Maternal-age effect in aneuploidy: does altered embryonic selection play a role? Am J Hum Genet. 1982 Jul;34(4):558–565. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bovicelli L., Orsini L. F., Rizzo N., Montacuti V., Bacchetta M. Reproduction in Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jun;59(6 Suppl):13S–17S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Erickson J. D. Down syndrome, paternal age, maternal age and birth order. Ann Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;41(3):289–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb01896.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hassold T., Chen N., Funkhouser J., Jooss T., Manuel B., Matsuura J., Matsuyama A., Wilson C., Yamane J. A., Jacobs P. A. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980 Oct;44(Pt 2):151–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00955.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hassold T., Jacobs P., Kline J., Stein Z., Warburton D. Effect of maternal age on autosomal trisomies. Ann Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;44(Pt 1):29–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00943.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hook E. B., Chambers G. M. Estimated rates of Down syndrome in live births by one year maternal age intervals for mothers aged 20-49 in a New York State study-implications of the risk figures for genetic counseling and cost-benefit analysis of prenatal diagnosis programs. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(3A):123–141. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hook E. B. Chromosome abnormalities and spontaneous fetal death following amniocentesis: further data and associations with maternal age. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Jan;35(1):110–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hook E. B., Lindsjö A. Down syndrome in live births by single year maternal age interval in a Swedish study: comparison with results from a New York State study. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;30(1):19–27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Manning C. H., Goodman H. O. Parental origin of chromosomes in Down's syndrome. Hum Genet. 1981;59(2):101–103. doi: 10.1007/BF00293054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Martin R. H., Lin C. C., Balkan W., Burns K. Direct chromosomal analysis of human spermatozoa: preliminary results from 18 normal men. Am J Hum Genet. 1982 May;34(3):459–468. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Matsunaga E., Tonomura A. Parental age and birth weight in translocation Down's syndrome. Ann Hum Genet. 1972 Nov;36(2):209–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1972.tb00770.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mattei J. F., Ayme S., Mattei M. G., Giraud F. Maternal age and origin of non-disjunction in trisomy 21. J Med Genet. 1980 Oct;17(5):368–372. doi: 10.1136/jmg.17.5.368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mikkelsen M., Poulsen H., Grinsted J., Lange A. Non-disjunction in trisomy 21: study of chromosomal heteromorphisms in 110 families. Ann Hum Genet. 1980 Jul;44(Pt 1):17–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00942.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wagenbichler P., Killian W., Rett A., Schnedl W. Origin of the extra chromosome no. 21 in Down's syndrome. Hum Genet. 1976 Apr 15;32(1):13–16. doi: 10.1007/BF00569971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. del Mazo J., Pérez Castillo A., Abrisqueta J. A. Trisomy 21: origin of non-disjunction. Hum Genet. 1982;62(4):316–320. doi: 10.1007/BF00304546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

RESOURCES