Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1997 Aug;63(8):3111–3118. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.8.3111-3118.1997

Characterization of the sediment bacterial community in groundwater discharge zones of an alkaline fen: a seasonal study.

T C Gsell 1, W E Holben 1, R M Ventullo 1
PMCID: PMC168608  PMID: 9251197

Abstract

The cell density, activity, and community structure of the bacterial community in wetland sediments were monitored over a 13-month period. The study was performed at Cedar Bog, an alkaline fen. The objective was to characterize the relationship between the sediment bacterial community in groundwater upwelling zones and the physical and chemical factors which might influence the community structure and activity. DNA, protein, and lipid synthesis were measured at three different upwelling zones by using [3H]thymidine, [14C]leucine, and [14C]glucose incorporation, respectively. The physiological status (apparent stress) of the consortium was assessed by comparing [14C]glucose incorporation into membrane and that into storage lipids. Bacterial cell density was determined by acridine orange direct counts, and gross bacterial community structure was determined by bisbenzimidazole-cesium chloride gradient analysis of total bacterial community DNA. Both seasonal and site-related covariation were observed in all estimates of bacterial biomass and activity. Growth rate estimates and cell density peaked in late July at 2.5 x 10(8) cells/g/day and 2.7 x 10(9) cells/g, respectively, and decreased in December to 2.0 x 10(7) cells/g/day and 1.5 x 10(9) cells/g, respectively. Across sites, membrane-to-storage-lipid ratios were generally highest in late spring and peaked in September for one site. Overall, the data indicate dynamic seasonal differences in sediment bacterial community activity and physiology, possibly in response to changing physical and chemical environmental factors which included the C/N/P ratios of the perfusing groundwater. By contrast, total cell numbers were rather constant, and community structure analysis indicated that the overall community structure was similar throughout the study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (260.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bott T. L., Kaplan L. A. Bacterial biomass, metabolic state, and activity in stream sediments: relation to environmental variables and multiple assay comparisons. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):508–522. doi: 10.1128/aem.50.2.508-522.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brittain A. M., Karl D. M. Catabolism of tritiated thymidine by aquatic microbial communities and incorporation of tritium into RNA and protein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990 May;56(5):1245–1254. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.5.1245-1254.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chin-Leo G., Kirchman D. L. Estimating bacterial production in marine waters from the simultaneous incorporation of thymidine and leucine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Aug;54(8):1934–1939. doi: 10.1128/aem.54.8.1934-1939.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fuhrman J. A., Azam F. Bacterioplankton secondary production estimates for coastal waters of british columbia, antarctica, and california. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1980 Jun;39(6):1085–1095. doi: 10.1128/aem.39.6.1085-1095.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hobbie J. E., Daley R. J., Jasper S. Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225–1228. doi: 10.1128/aem.33.5.1225-1228.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holben W. E., Harris D. DNA-based monitoring of total bacterial community structure in environmental samples. Mol Ecol. 1995 Oct;4(5):627–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00263.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Karl D. M. Cellular nucleotide measurements and applications in microbial ecology. Microbiol Rev. 1980 Dec;44(4):739–796. doi: 10.1128/mr.44.4.739-796.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kirchman D., Ducklow H., Mitchell R. Estimates of bacterial growth from changes in uptake rates and biomass. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Dec;44(6):1296–1307. doi: 10.1128/aem.44.6.1296-1307.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kirchman D., K'nees E., Hodson R. Leucine incorporation and its potential as a measure of protein synthesis by bacteria in natural aquatic systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Mar;49(3):599–607. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.3.599-607.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Robarts R. D., Wicks R. J., Sephton L. M. Spatial and Temporal Variations in Bacterial Macromolecule Labeling with [methyl-H]Thymidine in a Hypertrophic Lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Dec;52(6):1368–1373. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.6.1368-1373.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Toolan T., Wehr J. D., Findlay S. Inorganic phosphorus stimulation of bacterioplankton production in a meso-eutrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Jul;57(7):2074–2078. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.7.2074-2078.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vestal J. R., White D. C. Lipid analysis in microbial ecology: quantitative approaches to the study of microbial communities. Bioscience. 1989 Sep;39(8):535–541. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES