Skip to main content
The Canadian Veterinary Journal logoLink to The Canadian Veterinary Journal
. 1994 Apr;35(4):233–238.

Efficacy of an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae bacterin against serotypes 1, 3, 5 and 9.

K Tarasiuk 1, Z Pejsak 1, A Hogg 1, M P Carlson 1
PMCID: PMC1686744  PMID: 8076279

Abstract

A trial was performed in a swine research facility to ascertain the protection provided by a polyvalent Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (APP) bacterin containing serotypes 1, 3, 5 and 9. The test animals consisted of 60, eight-week-old, piglets, which were randomly divided into four main groups. The four main groups were further divided into three sub-groups (I, II, III) of five pigs each. Subgroup I was vaccinated intramuscularly, sub-group II was vaccinated subcutaneously, and sub-group III served as the unvaccinated control group. Each main group was challenged with a single APP serotype (1, 3, 5 or 9). Criteria for evaluation of the bacterin efficacy were mortality, lung lesions, pleural adhesions, and isolation of APP from tonsil or lung. Significant effects of vaccination over nonvaccination were reduced mortality, lung lesions, pleural adhesions, and isolations of APP from tonsil and lung. There were no significant differences between the intramuscular and subcutaneous routes of vaccination. It was concluded that the four-way APP bacterin used in this study provided satisfactory protection against homologous challenge. Evidence of protection was lower mortality and lung lesions and increased daily weight gains in vaccinates as compared with controls.

Full text

PDF
233

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gilbride K. A., Rosendal S. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 51 strains of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. Can J Comp Med. 1984 Jan;48(1):47–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grizzle J. E., Starmer C. F., Koch G. G. Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics. 1969 Sep;25(3):489–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Higgins R., Larivière S., Mittal K. R., Martineau G. P., Rousseau P., Cameron J. Evaluation of a Killed Vaccine Against Porcine Pleuropneumonia Due to Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. Can Vet J. 1985 Feb;26(2):86–89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hirsh D. C., Martin L. D., Libal M. C. Plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. Am J Vet Res. 1982 Feb;43(2):269–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kume K., Nakai T., Sawata A. Efficacy of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae vaccine in pigs. Nihon Juigaku Zasshi. 1985 Apr;47(2):201–206. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.47.201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nielsen R. Haemophilus parahaemolyticus serotypes. Pathogenicity and cross immunity. Nord Vet Med. 1979 Oct;31(10):407–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nielsen R. Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotypes--cross protection experiments. Nord Vet Med. 1984 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):221–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nielsen R. Pleuropneumonia of swine caused by Haemophilus parahaemolyticus. Studies on the protection obtained by vaccination. Nord Vet Med. 1976 Jul-Aug;28(7-8):337–348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rosendal S., Carpenter D. S., Mitchell W. R., Wilson M. R. Vaccination against pleuropneumonia of pigs caused by Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae. Can Vet J. 1981 Feb;22(2):34–35. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES