Skip to main content
The Canadian Veterinary Journal logoLink to The Canadian Veterinary Journal
. 1995 Apr;36(4):223–229.

Efficacy of a feed-additive antibacterial combination for improving feedlot cattle performance and health.

G F Gallo 1, J L Berg 1
PMCID: PMC1686940  PMID: 7600512

Abstract

The effectiveness of a feed-additive antimicrobial combination for improving feedlot performance and health was tested using 4325 high-risk feeder calves randomly allocated to a control group or an experimental group. The experimental group received the conventional ration plus a feed additive containing 700 mg per head/day of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine from arrival at the feedlot to day 56 of the feeding period. The inclusion of the feed additive to the ration significantly improved average daily gain for days 0-28 (P = 0.0163) and 0-56 (P = 0.0001), and the feed conversion for days 0-28 (P = 0.0061) and 0-56 (P = 0.0004). Additionally, the use of the feed additive significantly reduced the rate of bovine respiratory disease morbidity for days 0-28 (P = 0.0014) and 0-56 (P = 0.0001), the rate of relapses and mortality for days 0-56 (P = 0.0151 and P = 0.0209, respectively), and the rate of animals diagnosed with chronic respiratory disease for days 0-28 and 0-56 (P = 0.0009 and P = 0.0002, respectively). Performance and health improvements produced by the use of the feed additive were cost-effective.

Full text

PDF
223

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Harland R. J., Jim G. K., Guichon P. T., Townsend H. G., Janzen E. D. Efficacy of parenteral antibiotics for disease prophylaxis in feedlot calves. Can Vet J. 1991 Mar;32(3):163–168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harris F. W., Janzen E. D. The Haemophilus somnus disease complex (Hemophilosis): A review. Can Vet J. 1989 Oct;30(10):816–822. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hutchings D. L., Martin S. W. A mail survey of factors associated with morbidity and mortality in feedlot calves in southwestern Ontario. Can J Comp Med. 1983 Apr;47(2):101–107. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kelly A. P., Janzen E. D. A review of morbidity and mortality rates and disease occurrence in north american feedlot cattle. Can Vet J. 1986 Dec;27(12):496–500. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lofgreen G. P., Stinocher L. H., Kiesling H. E. Effects of dietary energy, free choice alfalfa hay and mass medication on calves subjected to marketing and shipping stresses. J Anim Sci. 1980 Apr;50(4):590–596. doi: 10.2527/jas1980.504590x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ribble C. S., Jim G. K., Janzen E. D. Efficacy of immunization of feedlot calves with a commercial Haemophilus somnus bacterin. Can J Vet Res. 1988 Apr;52(2):191–198. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Donkersgoed J., Janzen E. D., Harland R. J. Epidemiological features of calf mortality due to hemophilosis in a large feedlot. Can Vet J. 1990 Dec;31(12):821–825. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Van Donkersgoed J. Meta-analysis of field trials of antimicrobial mass medication for prophylaxis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle. Can Vet J. 1992 Dec;33(12):786–795. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yates W. D. A review of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, shipping fever pneumonia and viral-bacterial synergism in respiratory disease of cattle. Can J Comp Med. 1982 Jul;46(3):225–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Canadian Veterinary Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Veterinary Medical Association

RESOURCES