Abstract
A previous study of women who had died from myocardial infarction and of a control group of women matched with them for age suggested a fivefold increase in the risk of death from myocardial infarction among users of oral contraceptive aged 40-44 years compared with women not using such preparations. Only a small proportion of women in the infarction and control groups had used oral contraceptives, however, so the margin of error was wide. We therefore investigated a further 54 women in this age group who died from myocardial infarction and compared their oral contraceptive histories with those of age-matched, living controls. Combination of the findings from the present investigation with the previous results have enabled a revised estimate of a threefold increase in risk to be made. Although this risk estimate is similar to that previously shown for a younger age group, the total mortality attributable to complications associated with the use of oral contraceptives remained considerably greater among women over the age of 40.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Mann J. I., Inman W. H. Oral contraceptives and death from myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1975 May 3;2(5965):245–248. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5965.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miettinen O. S. Estimation of relative risk from individually matched series. Biometrics. 1970 Mar;26(1):75–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Potts D. M., Swyer G. I. Effectiveness and risks of birth-control methods. Br Med Bull. 1970 Jan;26(1):26–32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Small D. M. Editorial: Hormone use to change normal physiology - is the risk worth it? N Engl J Med. 1976 Jan 22;294(4):219–221. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197601222940409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stolley P. D., Tonascia J. A., Tockman M. S., Sartwell P. E., Rutledge A. H., Jacobs M. P. Thrombosis with low-estrogen oral contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol. 1975 Sep;102(3):197–208. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]