Abstract
Conventional detection and confirmation methods for Campylobacter jejuni are lengthy and tedious. A rapid hybridization protocol in which a 1,475-bp chromogen-labelled DNA probe (pDT1720) and Campylobacter strains filtered and grown on 0.22-micron-pore-size hydrophobic grid membrane filters (HGMFs) are used was developed. Among the environmental and clinical isolates of C. jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni subsp. doylei, Campylobacter lari, and Arcobacter nitrofigilis and a panel of 310 unrelated bacterial strains tested, only C. jejuni and C. jejuni subsp. doylei isolates hybridized with the probe under stringent conditions. The specificity of the probe was confirmed when the protocol was applied to spiked skim milk and chicken rinse samples. Based on the nucleotide sequence of pDT1720, a pair of oligonucleotide primers was designed for PCR amplification of DNA from Campylobacter spp. and other food pathogens grown overnight in selective Mueller-Hinton broth with cefoperazone and growth supplements. All C. jejuni strains tested, including DNase-producing strains and C. jejuni subsp. doylei, produced a specific 402-bp amplicon, as confirmed by restriction and Southern blot analysis. The detection range of the assay was as low as 3 CFU per PCR to as high as 10(5) CFU per PCR for pure cultures. Overnight enrichment of chicken rinse samples spiked initially with as little as approximately 10 CFU/ml produced amplicons after the PCR. No amplicon was detected with any of the other bacterial strains tested or from the chicken background microflora. Since C. jejuni is responsible for 99% of Campylobacter contamination in poultry, PCR and HGMF hybridization were performed on naturally contaminated chicken rinse samples, and the results were compared with the results of conventional cultural isolation on Preston agar. All samples confirmed to be culture positive for C. jejuni were also identified by DNA hybridization and PCR amplification, thus confirming that these DNA-based technologies are suitable alternatives to time-consuming conventional detection methods. DNA hybridization, besides being sensitive, also has the potential to be used in direct enumeration of C. jejuni organisms in chicken samples.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (774.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bolton F. J., Robertson L. A selective medium for isolating Campylobacter jejuni/coli. J Clin Pathol. 1982 Apr;35(4):462–467. doi: 10.1136/jcp.35.4.462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Camp R. C. Benchmarking--a conversation with Robert C. Camp. The source. Interview by Joe Flower. Healthc Forum J. 1993 Jan-Feb;36(1):30–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Docherty L., Adams M. R., Patel P., McFadden J. The magnetic immuno-polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Campylobacter in milk and poultry. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Apr;22(4):288–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1996.tb01163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eyers M., Chapelle S., Van Camp G., Goossens H., De Wachter R. Discrimination among thermophilic Campylobacter species by polymerase chain reaction amplification of 23S rRNA gene fragments. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3340–3343. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3340-3343.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giesendorf B. A., Quint W. G., Henkens M. H., Stegeman H., Huf F. A., Niesters H. G. Rapid and sensitive detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken products by using the polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Dec;58(12):3804–3808. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.12.3804-3808.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giesendorf B. A., van Belkum A., Koeken A., Stegeman H., Henkens M. H., van der Plas J., Goossens H., Niesters H. G., Quint W. G. Development of species-specific DNA probes for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, and Campylobacter lari by polymerase chain reaction fingerprinting. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1541–1546. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1541-1546.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hazeleger W., Arkesteijn C., Toorop-Bouma A., Beumer R. Detection of the coccoid form of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken products with the use of the polymerase chain reaction. Int J Food Microbiol. 1994 Dec;24(1-2):273–281. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(94)90125-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oyofo B. A., Thornton S. A., Burr D. H., Trust T. J., Pavlovskis O. R., Guerry P. Specific detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli by using polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2613–2619. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2613-2619.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Romaniuk P. J., Trust T. J. Rapid identification of Campylobacter species using oligonucleotide probes to 16S ribosomal RNA. Mol Cell Probes. 1989 Jun;3(2):133–142. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(89)90024-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor D. E., Hiratsuka K. Use of non-radioactive DNA probes for detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in stool specimens. Mol Cell Probes. 1990 Aug;4(4):261–271. doi: 10.1016/0890-8508(90)90018-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uyttendaele M., Schukkink R., van Gemen B., Debevere J. Detection of Campylobacter jejuni added to foods by using a combined selective enrichment and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA). Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Apr;61(4):1341–1347. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.4.1341-1347.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winters D. K., Slavik M. F. Evaluation of a PCR based assay for specific detection of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken washes. Mol Cell Probes. 1995 Oct;9(5):307–310. doi: 10.1016/s0890-8508(95)91556-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]