Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Jan 22;264(1378):9–15. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0002

Virulence, parasite mode of transmission, and host fluctuating asymmetry.

P Agnew 1, J C Koella 1
PMCID: PMC1688217  PMID: 9061958

Abstract

Horizontally transmitted parasites are broadly predicted to be more virulent, or costly to host fitness, than those with vertical transmission. This is mainly because vertical transmission, from host parent to offspring, explicitly links the reproductive interests of both parties. Underlying this prediction is a general assumption that parasite transmission success is positively correlated with its virulence. We report results where infection of larval yellow fever mosquitoes Aedes aegypti with the microsporidian Edhazardia aedis was experimentally manipulated. The parasite's complex life cycle allowed comparisons between estimates of horizontal and vertical transmission on host fitness. Our measure of virulence was the fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of adult female wings. Hosts harbouring spores showed higher FAs than controls. Horizontally transmitting spores were associated with higher FAs than vertically transmitting spores. Furthermore, within hosts FA correlated positively with the number of horizontally transmitting spores, while no relation was seen with the number of vertically transmitting spores. A developmental mechanism uncoupling the relationship between vertical transmission and virulence is proposed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (371.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andreadis T. G. Host range tests with Edhazardia aedis (Microsporida: Culicosporidae) against northern Nearctic mosquitoes. J Invertebr Pathol. 1994 Jul;64(1):46–51. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1994.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Becnel J. J., Garcia J. J., Johnson M. A. Edhazardia aedis (Microspora: Culicosporidae) effects on the reproductive capacity of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol. 1995 Jul;32(4):549–553. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/32.4.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Becnel J. J., Sprague V., Fukuda T., Hazard E. I. Development of Edhazardia aedis (Kudo, 1930) n. g., n. comb. (Microsporida: Amblyosporidae) in the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). J Protozool. 1989 Mar-Apr;36(2):119–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1989.tb01057.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clayton D. H., Tompkins D. M. Ectoparasite virulence is linked to mode of transmission. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 22;256(1347):211–217. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ebert D., Herre E. A. The evolution of parasitic diseases. Parasitol Today. 1996 Mar;12(3):96–101. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(96)80668-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Herre E. A. Population structure and the evolution of virulence in nematode parasites of fig wasps. Science. 1993 Mar 5;259(5100):1442–1445. doi: 10.1126/science.259.5100.1442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Møller A. P., Pomiankowski A. Punctuated equilibria or gradual evolution: fluctuating asymmetry and variation in the rate of evolution. J Theor Biol. 1993 Apr 7;161(3):359–367. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sprague V., Becnel J. J., Hazard E. I. Taxonomy of phylum microspora. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1992;18(5-6):285–395. doi: 10.3109/10408419209113519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sweeney A. W., Doggett S. L., Gullick G. Laboratory experiments on infection rates of Amblyospora dyxenoides (Microsporida: Amblyosporidae) in the mosquito Culex annulirostris. J Invertebr Pathol. 1989 Jan;53(1):85–92. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(89)90077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES