Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):437–444. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0062

Capgras syndrome: a novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons.

W Hirstein 1, V S Ramachandran 1
PMCID: PMC1688258  PMID: 9107057

Abstract

Patients with Capgras syndrome regard people whom they know well such as their parents or siblings as imposters. Here we describe a case (DS) of this syndrome who presents several novel features. DS was unusual in that his delusion was modality-specific: he claimed that his parents were imposters when he was looking at them but not when speaking to them on the telephone. Unlike normals, DS's skin conductance responses to photographs of familiar people, including his parents, were not larger in magnitude than his responses to photographs of unfamiliar people. We suggest that in this patient connections from face-processing areas in the temporal lobe to the limbic system have been damaged, a loss which may explain why he calls his parents imposters. In addition, DS was very poor at judging gaze direction. Finally, when presented with a sequence of photographs of the same model's face looking in different directions, DS asserted that they were "different women who looked just like each other'. In the absence of limbic activation, DS creates separate memory "files' of the same person, apparently because he is unable to extract and link the common denominator of successive episodic memories. Thus, far from being a medical curiosity. Capgras syndrome may help us to explore the formation of new memories caught in flagrante delicto.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (183.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anstis S. M., Mayhew J. W., Morley T. The perception of where a face or television "portrait" is looking. Am J Psychol. 1969 Dec;82(4):474–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bancaud J., Brunet-Bourgin F., Chauvel P., Halgren E. Anatomical origin of déjà vu and vivid 'memories' in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 1994 Feb;117(Pt 1):71–90. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bauer R. M. Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: a neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia. 1984;22(4):457–469. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruyer R. Covert face recognition in prosopagnosia: a review. Brain Cogn. 1991 Mar;15(2):223–235. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chattarji S., Stanton P. K., Sejnowski T. J. Commissural synapses, but not mossy fiber synapses, in hippocampal field CA3 exhibit associative long-term potentiation and depression. Brain Res. 1989 Aug 21;495(1):145–150. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Damasio A. R., Damasio H., Van Hoesen G. W. Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology. 1982 Apr;32(4):331–341. doi: 10.1212/wnl.32.4.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eckhoff WC, Miller CE, Billera CF, Engel PS, Curl RF. The C-D Stretch of Monodeuterated Propargyl Radical (CH2CCD) J Mol Spectrosc. 1997 Nov;186(1):193–202. doi: 10.1006/jmsp.1997.7437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis H. D., Young A. W. Accounting for delusional misidentifications. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;157:239–248. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.2.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. Brain. 1965 Sep;88(3):585–644. doi: 10.1093/brain/88.3.585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gross C. G. Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):3–10. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Luauté J. P., Bidault E. Capgras syndrome: agnosia of identification and delusion of reduplication. Psychopathology. 1994;27(3-5):186–193. doi: 10.1159/000284868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Man K. M., Keeffe E. B., García-Kennedy R., Hansen J. E., Verhille M. S. Acute appendicitis secondary to metastatic cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993 Nov;88(11):1966–1968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matzel L. D., Collin C., Alkon D. L. Biophysical and behavioral correlates of memory storage, degradation, and reactivation. Behav Neurosci. 1992 Dec;106(6):954–963. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.106.6.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mishkin M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature. 1978 May 25;273(5660):297–298. doi: 10.1038/273297a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oliver M. W., Baudry M., Lynch G. The protease inhibitor leupeptin interferes with the development of LTP in hippocampal slices. Brain Res. 1989 Dec 29;505(2):233–238. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91448-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ramachandran V. S. Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Conscious Cogn. 1995 Mar;4(1):22–51. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ramachandran V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran D., Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature. 1995 Oct 12;377(6549):489–490. doi: 10.1038/377489a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ramachandran V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Apr 22;263(1369):377–386. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Signer S. F. Localization and lateralization in the delusion of substitution. Capgras symptom and its variants. Psychopathology. 1994;27(3-5):168–176. doi: 10.1159/000284866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Skehel P. A., Armitage B. A., Bartsch D., Hu Y., Kaang B. K., Siegelbaum S. A., Kandel E. R., Martin K. C. Proteins functioning in synaptic transmission at the sensory to motor synapse of Aplysia. Neuropharmacology. 1995 Nov;34(11):1379–1385. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(95)00149-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Teske J. A. Seeing her looking at you: acquaintance and variation in the judgment of gaze depth. Am J Psychol. 1988 Summer;101(2):239–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tovee M. J., Rolls E. T., Ramachandran V. S. Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. Neuroreport. 1996 Nov 4;7(15-17):2757–2760. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199611040-00070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tranel D., Damasio A. R. Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science. 1985 Jun 21;228(4706):1453–1454. doi: 10.1126/science.4012303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tranel D., Damasio A. R. Non-conscious face recognition in patients with face agnosia. Behav Brain Res. 1988 Oct;30(3):235–249. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(88)90166-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tranel D., Damasio H. Intact electrodermal skin conductance responses after bilateral amygdala damage. Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(4):381–390. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90046-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Weiskrantz L. Neuroanatomy of memory and amnesia: a case for multiple memory systems. Hum Neurobiol. 1987;6(2):93–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Young A. W., Aggleton J. P., Hellawell D. J., Johnson M., Broks P., Hanley J. R. Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy. Brain. 1995 Feb;118(Pt 1):15–24. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Young A. W., Reid I., Wright S., Hellawell D. J. Face-processing impairments and the Capgras delusion. Br J Psychiatry. 1993 May;162:695–698. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.5.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES