Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Apr 22;264(1381):505–511. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0072

The role of 'hidden preferences' in the artificial co-evolution of symmetrical signals

S Bullock, D Cliff
PMCID: PMC1688390

Abstract

Recently, within the biology literature, there has been some interest in exploring the evolutionary function of animal displays through computer simulations of evolutionary processes. Here we provide a critique of an exploration of the evolutionary function of complex symmetrical displays. We investigate the hypothesis that complex symmetrical signal form is the product of a 'hidden preference' inherent in all sensory systems (i.e. a universal sensory bias). Through extending previous work and relaxing its assumptions we reveal that the posited 'hidden preference' for complex symmetry is in reality a preference for homogeneity. The resulting implications for further accounts of the evolutionary function of complex symmetrical patterning are considered.

Keywords: Artificial Co-Evolution

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (361.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arak A., Enquist M. Conflict, receiver bias and the evolution of signal form. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Sep 29;349(1330):337–344. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cook N. D. Artefact or network evolution? Nature. 1995 Mar 23;374(6520):313–314. doi: 10.1038/374313a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawkins M. S., Guilford T. An exaggerated preference for simple neural network models of signal evolution? Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Sep 22;261(1362):357–360. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Enquist M., Arak A. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature. 1993 Feb 4;361(6411):446–448. doi: 10.1038/361446a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Enquist M., Arak A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature. 1994 Nov 10;372(6502):169–172. doi: 10.1038/372169a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Enquist M., Arak A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature. 1994 Nov 10;372(6502):169–172. doi: 10.1038/372169a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Johnstone R. A. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature. 1994 Nov 10;372(6502):172–175. doi: 10.1038/372172a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES