Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Aug 22;264(1385):1111–1116. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0153

Does variation of sex ratio enhance reproductive success of offspring in tawny owls (Strix aluco)

B M Appleby, S J Petty, J K Blakey, P Rainey, D W Macdonald
PMCID: PMC1688563

Abstract

Tawny owls, Strix aluco, laid female-biased clutches on territories with more abundant prey (field voles) in June, the month that chicks fledge. This appeared to enhance the subsequent reproductive success of fledglings, as in 1995 there was a significant correlation between the number of chicks fledged by adult females and the June vole abundance in the territory on which they were reared as chicks. This relationship did not hold for males. Since tawny owls lay eggs in March, these results indicate that owls are able to predict the June vole numbers on their territory, and respond by producing more of the sex most likely to gain a long-term benefit when resources are good.

Keywords: Tawny Owls Prey Indexes Food Supply Reproductive Success Sex Ratio

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (292.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Feinberg A. P., Vogelstein B. "A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity". Addendum. Anal Biochem. 1984 Feb;137(1):266–267. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90381-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Griffiths R., Daan S., Dijkstra C. Sex identification in birds using two CHD genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Sep 22;263(1374):1251–1256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Haywood S., Perrins C. M. Is clutch size in birds affected by environmental conditions during growth? Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Aug 22;249(1325):195–197. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S. L. Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA. Nature. 1985 Mar 7;314(6006):67–73. doi: 10.1038/314067a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Miller S. A., Dykes D. D., Polesky H. F. A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1215–1215. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westneat D. F., Noon W. A., Reeve H. K., Aquadro C. F. Improved hybridization conditions for DNA 'fingerprints' probed with M13. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 May 11;16(9):4161–4161. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.9.4161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES