Abstract
Monogamy is typically considered to have evolved either because biparental care is important for offspring survival, or because males are unable to monopolize more than one female due to females being too dispersed. Here, in the first phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of monogamy in mammals, we show that neither of these explanations is consistent with the distribution of monogamy across mammal species. Monogamy evolved significantly more often in the absence of paternal care than in its presence. Furthermore, monogamy does not normally occur in species where female ranges are large. Rather, the most common feature of mammalian monogamy is that it evolved where females were solitary and occupied small, exclusive ranges, enabling males to monopolize them.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brotherton P. N., Pemberton J. M., Komers P. E., Malarky G. Genetic and behavioural evidence of monogamy in a mammal, Kirk's dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii). Proc Biol Sci. 1997 May 22;264(1382):675–681. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brotherton P. N., Rhodes A. Monogamy without biparental care in a dwarf antelope. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jan 22;263(1366):23–29. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H. Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 May 22;236(1285):339–372. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dene H., Goodman M., McKenna M. C., Romero-Herrera A. E. Ochotona princeps (pika) myoglobin: an appraisal of lagomorph phylogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Mar;79(6):1917–1920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.6.1917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleiman D. G. Monogamy in mammals. Q Rev Biol. 1977 Mar;52(1):39–69. doi: 10.1086/409721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nedbal M. A., Allard M. W., Honeycutt R. L. Molecular systematics of hystricognath rodents: evidence from the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1994 Sep;3(3):206–220. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1994.1023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purvis A. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 29;348(1326):405–421. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saether B. E., Gordon I. J. The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 22;256(1347):263–268. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]