Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1497–1500. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0207

No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews.

P Stockley 1
PMCID: PMC1688695  PMID: 9364789

Abstract

There is currently much interest in the suggestion that females are capable of post-copulatory (or cryptic) choice for male genetic compatibility. Here, I investigate this idea using data from mixed-paternity litters of the common shrew (Sorex araneus). Females of this species are highly promiscuous and, in natural populations, regularly incur costs of inbreeding by mating with close relatives. Selection should therefore favour female ability for sperm selection on the basis of male relatedness. No evidence was found in support of this idea. Relative number of offspring sired within mixed paternity litters was not significantly correlated with genetic similarity of males to the female mated. Relative fertilization success was, however, significantly related to male epididymal sperm counts. I conclude that most variation in relative fertilization success of male common shrews can be explained in terms of sperm competition, and that females of this species may not be capable of sperm selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S. L. Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA. Nature. 1985 Mar 7;314(6006):67–73. doi: 10.1038/314067a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mossey J. M., Shapiro E. Physician use by the elderly over an eight-year period. Am J Public Health. 1985 Nov;75(11):1333–1334. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.11.1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  4. Parker G. A. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol. 1982 May 21;96(2):281–294. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stockley P., Searle J. B., MacDonald D. W., Jones C. S. Female multiple mating behaviour in the common shrew as a strategy to reduce inbreeding. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Dec 22;254(1341):173–179. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Tegelström H., Searle J., Brookfield J., Mercer S. Multiple paternity in wild common shrews (Sorex araneus) is confirmed by DNA-fingerprinting. Heredity (Edinb) 1991 Jun;66(Pt 3):373–379. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1991.47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wedekind C. Mate choice and maternal selection for specific parasite resistances before; during and after fertilization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 29;346(1317):303–311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES