Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471–1479. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0204

Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?

C Wedekind 1, S Füri 1
PMCID: PMC1688704  PMID: 9364787

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is an immunologically important group of genes that appears to be under natural as well as sexual selection. Several hypotheses suggest that certain MHC-allele combinations (usually heterozygous ones) are superior under selective pressure by pathogens. This could influence mate choice in a way that preferences function to create MHC-heterozygous offspring, or that they function to create specific allele combinations that are beneficial under the current environmental conditions through their complementary or epistatic effects. To test these hypotheses, we asked 121 men and women to score the odours of six T-shirts, worn by two women and four men. Their scorings of pleasantness correlated negatively with the degree of MHC similarity between smeller and T-shirt-wearer in men and women who were not using the contraceptive pill (but not in Pill-users). Depending on the T-shirt-wearer, the amount of variance in the scorings of odour pleasantness that was explained by the degree of MHC similarity (r2) varied between nearly 0 and 23%. There was no apparent effect of gender in this correlation: the highest r2 was actually reached with one of the male odours sniffed by male smellers. Men and women who were reminded of their own mate/ex-mate when sniffing a T-shirt had significantly fewer MHC-alleles in common with this T-shirt-wearer than expected by chance. This suggests that the MHC or linked genes influence human mate choice. We found no significant effect when we tested for an influence of the MHC on odour preferences after the degree of similarity between T-shirt-wearer and smeller was statistically controlled for. This suggests that in our study populations the MHC influences body odour preferences mainly, if not exclusively, by the degree of similarity or dissimilarity. The observed preferences would increase heterozygosity in the progeny. They do not seem to aim for more specific MHC combinations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (175.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ben-Arie N., Lancet D., Taylor C., Khen M., Walker N., Ledbetter D. H., Carrozzo R., Patel K., Sheer D., Lehrach H. Olfactory receptor gene cluster on human chromosome 17: possible duplication of an ancestral receptor repertoire. Hum Mol Genet. 1994 Feb;3(2):229–235. doi: 10.1093/hmg/3.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Doherty P. C., Zinkernagel R. M. Enhanced immunological surveillance in mice heterozygous at the H-2 gene complex. Nature. 1975 Jul 3;256(5512):50–52. doi: 10.1038/256050a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doty R. L., Snyder P. J., Huggins G. R., Lowry L. D. Endocrine, cardiovascular, and psychological correlated of olfactory sensitivity changes during the human menstrual cycle. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1981 Feb;95(1):45–60. doi: 10.1037/h0077755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fan W., Liu Y. C., Parimoo S., Weissman S. M. Olfactory receptor-like genes are located in the human major histocompatibility complex. Genomics. 1995 May 1;27(1):119–123. doi: 10.1006/geno.1995.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilbert A. N., Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Thomas L. Olfactory discrimination of mouse strains (Mus musculus) and major histocompatibility types by humans (Homo sapiens). J Comp Psychol. 1986 Sep;100(3):262–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hedrick P. W., Thomson G. Evidence for balancing selection at HLA. Genetics. 1983 Jul;104(3):449–456. doi: 10.1093/genetics/104.3.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirayama K., Matsushita S., Kikuchi I., Iuchi M., Ohta N., Sasazuki T. HLA-DQ is epistatic to HLA-DR in controlling the immune response to schistosomal antigen in humans. Nature. 1987 Jun 4;327(6121):426–430. doi: 10.1038/327426a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hold B., Schleidt M. The importance of human odour in non-verbal communication. Z Tierpsychol. 1977 Mar;43(3):225–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hughes A. L., Nei M. Pattern of nucleotide substitution at major histocompatibility complex class I loci reveals overdominant selection. Nature. 1988 Sep 8;335(6186):167–170. doi: 10.1038/335167a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Koelega H. S., Köster E. P. Some experiments on sex differences in odor perception. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1974 Sep 27;237(0):234–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1974.tb49859.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K., Potts W. K. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature. 1992 Dec 10;360(6404):581–583. doi: 10.1038/360581a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Potts W. K., Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):619–621. doi: 10.1038/352619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Potts W. K., Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K. The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 29;346(1317):369–378. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Potts W. K., Wakeland E. K. Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: a tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference. Trends Genet. 1993 Dec;9(12):408–412. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90103-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wedekind C., Chapuisat M., Macas E., Rülicke T. Non-random fertilization in mice correlates with the MHC and something else. Heredity (Edinb) 1996 Oct;77(Pt 4):400–409. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1996.160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wedekind C. Handicaps not obligatory in sexual selection for resistance genes. J Theor Biol. 1994 Sep 7;170(1):57–62. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wedekind C. Mate choice and maternal selection for specific parasite resistances before; during and after fertilization. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 29;346(1317):303–311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wedekind C., Seebeck T., Bettens F., Paepke A. J. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245–249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Egorov I. K., Bard J., Thomas L., Boyse E. A. Sensory distinction between H-2b and H-2bm1 mutant mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Sep;80(18):5685–5688. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.18.5685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Kupniewski D., Bard J., Thomas L., Boyse E. A. Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1331–1332. doi: 10.1126/science.3375818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Shen F. W., Bard J., Boyse E. A. Discrimination of odortypes determined by the major histocompatibility complex among outbred mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Apr 26;91(9):3735–3738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Wysocki C. J., Bard J., Thomas L., Boyse E. A. Recognition of H-2 types in relation to the blocking of pregnancy in mice. Science. 1983 Jul 8;221(4606):186–188. doi: 10.1126/science.6857281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yamazaki K., Boyse E. A., Miké V., Thaler H. T., Mathieson B. J., Abbott J., Boyse J., Zayas Z. A., Thomas L. Control of mating preferences in mice by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1324–1335. doi: 10.1084/jem.144.5.1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Yamazaki K., Yamaguchi M., Baranoski L., Bard J., Boyse E. A., Thomas L. Recognition among mice. Evidence from the use of a Y-maze differentially scented by congenic mice of different major histocompatibility types. J Exp Med. 1979 Oct 1;150(4):755–760. doi: 10.1084/jem.150.4.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES