Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Feb 7;265(1392):227–233. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0286

Vocal learning by greater spear-nosed bats.

J W Boughman 1
PMCID: PMC1688873  PMID: 9493408

Abstract

Vocal learning is well known among passerine and psittacine birds, but most data on mammals are equivocal. Specific benefits of vocal learning are poorly understood for most species. One case where vocal learning should be favoured by selection is where calls indicate group membership and group mates are unrelated. Female greater spear-nosed bats, Phyllostomus hastatus, live in stable groups of unrelated bats and use loud, broadband calls to coordinate foraging movements of social group mates. Bats benefit from group foraging. Calls differ between female social groups and cave colonies, and playback experiments demonstrate that bats perceive these acoustic differences. Here I show that the group distinctive structure of calls arises through vocal learning. Females change call structure when group composition changes, resulting in increased similarity among new social group mates. Comparisons of transfers with age-matched half-sibs indicate that call changes are not simply due to maturation, the physical environment or heredity. These results suggest that studies testing vocal learning in mammals could profit by focusing on vocalizations that signify group membership.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (511.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Esser K. H. Audio-vocal learning in a non-human mammal: the lesser spear-nosed bat Phyllostomus discolor. Neuroreport. 1994 Sep 8;5(14):1718–1720. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199409080-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Farabaugh S. M., Linzenbold A., Dooling R. J. Vocal plasticity in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): evidence for social factors in the learning of contact calls. J Comp Psychol. 1994 Mar;108(1):81–92. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.1.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517–546. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones G., Ransome R. D. Echolocation calls of bats are influenced by maternal effects and change over a lifetime. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 May 22;252(1334):125–128. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Reiss D., McCowan B. Spontaneous vocal mimicry and production by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): evidence for vocal learning. J Comp Psychol. 1993 Sep;107(3):301–312. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.107.3.301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Richards D. G., Wolz J. P., Herman L. M. Vocal mimicry of computer-generated sounds and vocal labeling of objects by a bottlenosed dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. J Comp Psychol. 1984 Mar;98(1):10–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES