Abstract
Most models for coevolution of hosts and parasites are based on the assumption that resistance of hosts to parasites is an all-or-nothing effect. In many cases, for example where parasites require an appropriate receptor on host cells, this is a reasonable assumption. However, in many other cases, for example where hosts mount an immune response, this picture may be too simple. An immune system is expensive to maintain, which poses a question as to how much of its resources a host should allocate to resist parasites: if the risk of infection is low, natural selection may favour hosts with less effective immune systems. As optimal allocation to defence will depend on the force of infection, and the force of infection, in turn, depends on the level of defence in the rest of the host population, a game-theoretic approach is necessary. Here I analyse a simple model for the evolution of the ability to recover from infection. If parasites are not allowed to coevolve, the outcome is a single evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS). If the parasites coevolve, multiple evolutionary outcomes are possible, one in which the parasites are relatively avirulent and common and the hosts invest little in recovery ability, and another (the escalated arms race) where parasites are rare but virulent and the hosts invest heavily in defence.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (319.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beck K. Coevolution: mathematical analysis of host-parasite interactions. J Math Biol. 1984;19(1):63–77. doi: 10.1007/BF00275931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bremermann H. J., Pickering J. A game-theoretical model of parasite virulence. J Theor Biol. 1983 Feb 7;100(3):411–426. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(83)90438-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dawkins R., Krebs J. R. Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):489–511. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eshel I. On the founder effect and the evolution of altruistic traits: an ecogenetical approach. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Jun;11(3):410–424. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90020-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank S. A. A kin selection model for the evolution of virulence. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Dec 22;250(1329):195–197. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank S. A. Ecological and genetic models of host-pathogen coevolution. Heredity (Edinb) 1991 Aug;67(Pt 1):73–83. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1991.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank S. A. Models of parasite virulence. Q Rev Biol. 1996 Mar;71(1):37–78. doi: 10.1086/419267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566–3573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maiden M. C. Population genetics of a transformable bacterium: the influence of horizontal genetic exchange on the biology of Neisseria meningitidis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993 Sep 15;112(3):243–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06457.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nowak M. A., May R. M. Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Jan 22;255(1342):81–89. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takumi K., De Boer R. J. Self assertion modeled as a network repertoire of multi-determinant antibodies. J Theor Biol. 1996 Nov 7;183(1):55–66. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]