Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Apr 7;265(1396):563–568. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0331

Adaptive sex ratio variation in pre-industrial human (Homo sapiens) populations?

V Lummaa 1, J Merilä 1, A Kause 1
PMCID: PMC1689011  PMID: 9881467

Abstract

Sex allocation theory predicts that in a population with a biased operational sex ratio (OSR), parents will increase their fitness by adjusting the sex ratio of their progeny towards the rarer sex, until OSR has reached a level where the overproduction of either sex no longer increases a parent's probability of having grandchildren. Furthermore, in a monogamous mating system, a biased OSR is expected to lead to lowered mean fecundity among individuals of the more abundant sex. We studied the influence of OSR on the sex ratio of newborns and on the population birth rate using an extensive data set (n = 14,420 births) from pre-industrial (1775-1850) Finland. The overall effect of current OSR on sex ratio at birth was significant, and in the majority of the 21 parishes included in this study, more sons were produced when males were rarer than females. This suggests that humans adjusted the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the local OSR to maximize the reproductive success of their progeny. Birth rate and, presumably, also population growth rate increased when the sex ratio (males:females) among reproductive age classes approached equality. However, the strength of these patterns varied across the parishes, suggesting that factors other than OSR (e.g. socioeconomic or environmental factors may also have influenced the sex ratio at birth and the birth rate.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (149.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beiles A. A buffered interaction between sex ratio, age difference at marriage, and population growth in humans, and their significance for sex ratio evolution. Heredity (Edinb) 1974 Oct;33(2):265–278. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1974.92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clutton-Brock T. H., Iason G. R. Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q Rev Biol. 1986 Sep;61(3):339–374. doi: 10.1086/415033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clutton-Brock T. H. Sons and daughters. Nature. 1982 Jul 1;298(5869):11–13. doi: 10.1038/298011a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clutton-Brock T. H., Vincent A. C. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58–60. doi: 10.1038/351058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ellegren H., Gustafsson L., Sheldon B. C. Sex ratio adjustment in relation to paternal attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Oct 15;93(21):11723–11728. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. James W. H. Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels at the time of conception. J Theor Biol. 1996 Jun 21;180(4):271–286. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. James W. H. The hypothesized hormonal control of human sex ratio at birth--an update. J Theor Biol. 1990 Apr 23;143(4):555–564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80029-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. James W. H. The hypothesized hormonal control of mammalian sex ratio at birth--a second update. J Theor Biol. 1992 Mar 7;155(1):121–128. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80552-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kär P., Jokela J., Helle T., Kojola I. Direct and correlative phenotypic selection on life-history traits in three pre-industrial human populations. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Nov 22;263(1376):1475–1480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MACMAHON B., PUGH T. F. Sex ratio of white births in the United States during the Second World War. Am J Hum Genet. 1954 Jun;6(2):284–292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nevanlinna H. R. The Finnish population structure. A genetic and genealogical study. Hereditas. 1972;71(2):195–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1972.tb01021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Trivers R. L., Hare H. Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect. Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249–263. doi: 10.1126/science.1108197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Werren J. H., Charnov E. L. Facultative sex ratios and population dynamics. Nature. 1978 Mar 23;272(5651):349–350. doi: 10.1038/272349a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams G. C. The question of adaptive sex ratio in outcrossed vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1979 Sep 21;205(1161):567–580. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1979.0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES