Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Jun 22;265(1401):1045–1049. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0397

Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions

R F Oliveira, P K McGregor, C Latruffe
PMCID: PMC1689170

Abstract

Many of the signals that animals use to communicate transmit relatively large distances and therefore encompass several potential signallers and receivers. This observation challenges the common characterization of animal communication systems as consisting of one signaller and one receiver. Furthermore, it suggests that the evolution of communication behaviour must be considered as occurring in the context of communication networks rather than dyads. Although considerations of selection pressures acting upon signallers in the context of communication networks have rarely been expressed in such terms, it has been noted that many signals exchanged during aggressive interactions will transmit far further than required for information transfer between the individuals directly involved, suggesting that these signals have been designed to be received by other, more distant, individuals. Here we consider the potential for receivers in communication networks to gather information, one aspect of which has been termed eavesdropping. We show that male Betta splendens monitor aggressive interactions between neighbouring conspecifics and use the information on relative fighting ability in subsequent aggressive interactions with the males they have observed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (190.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bronstein P. M. Agonistic and reproductive interactions in Betta splendens. J Comp Psychol. 1984 Dec;98(4):421–431. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bronstein P. M. Prior-residence effect in Betta splendens. J Comp Psychol. 1985 Mar;99(1):56–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Guilford T., Dawkins M. S. Receiver psychology and the design of animal signals. Trends Neurosci. 1993 Nov;16(11):430–436. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(93)90068-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Karakashian S. J., Gyger M., Marler P. Audience effects on alarm calling in chickens (Gallus gallus). J Comp Psychol. 1988 Jun;102(2):129–135. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.102.2.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Naguib M, Todt D. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim Behav. 1997 Dec;54(6):1535–1543. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.9997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES