Abstract
Food limitation has been suggested as one of the most important factors affecting life history evolution in terrestrial vertebrates. However, this inference is based mainly on evidence from birds, and reproductive trade-offs may differ among groups with different forms of parental care. To study whether the costs of enlarged litters (decreased mass of offspring) would appear when food is not limiting, we performed outdoor enclosure experiments in which we manipulated simultaneously the litter size (control versus litter plus two pups) and food availability (control versus food-supplemented) of female bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. The weaning success of females increased significantly in response to supplementary food. When females were provided with extra food, no differences were observed in body masses of weanlings of control and enlarged litters. Further, food-supplemented females grew to larger sizes during nursing than unsupplemented females. Our experiment suggests that energetic requirements during nursing constrain the number of offspring that can be raised successfully in a particular breeding attempt. The results also indicate that unlimited food resources may increase future reproductive potential of females because they can use more energy for somatic growth.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Mappes T., Koskela E., Ylönen H. Reproductive costs and litter size in the bank vole. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 22;261(1360):19–24. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- vom Saal F. S. Variation in phenotype due to random intrauterine positioning of male and female fetuses in rodents. J Reprod Fertil. 1981 Jul;62(2):633–650. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]