Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Jun 22;265(1401):1135–1139. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0409

Competition among growing organs and developmental control of morphological asymmetry

C P Klingenberg, H F Nijhout
PMCID: PMC1689179

Abstract

Fluctuating asymmetry is often used as a measure of developmental instability, although its developmental basis is poorly understood. Theoretical models and experimental studies have suggested that feedback interactions between structures on the left and right body sides play a pivotal role in the control of asymmetry. Here we provide experimental evidence that competition for a limiting resource can generate such interactions between growing organs. In our experiments in the butterfly Precis coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), hindwing imaginal discs were removed from one or both body sides of caterpillars. Emerging butterflies were thus missing one or both hindwings, but had heavier forewings, mid- and hindlegs than untreated controls. When only one hindwing was removed, the forewing and hindleg on the treated side were heavier than on the untreated side. The asymmetry and overall weight increase in response to wing disc removal diminished with increasing physical distance of the responding tissue from the imaginal disc removed. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that growing imaginal discs compete for a haemolymph-borne resource, such as a nutrient or growth factor. Such competition is a possible mechanism for feedback interactions and may thus participate in the developmental control of asymmetry.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Batterham P., Davies A. G., Game A. Y., McKenzie J. A. Asymmetry--where evolutionary and developmental genetics meet. Bioessays. 1996 Oct;18(10):841–845. doi: 10.1002/bies.950181011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryant P. J., Schmidt O. The genetic control of cell proliferation in Drosophila imaginal discs. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1990;13:169–189. doi: 10.1242/jcs.1990.supplement_13.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryant P. J., Simpson P. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of growth in developing organs. Q Rev Biol. 1984 Dec;59(4):387–415. doi: 10.1086/414040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davies A. G., Game A. Y., Chen Z., Williams T. J., Goodall S., Yen J. L., McKenzie J. A., Batterham P. Scalloped wings is the Lucilia cuprina Notch homologue and a candidate for the modifier of fitness and asymmetry of diazinon resistance. Genetics. 1996 Jul;143(3):1321–1337. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.3.1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McCabe J., French V., Partridge L. Joint regulation of cell size and cell number in the wing blade of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1997 Feb;69(1):61–68. doi: 10.1017/s0016672397002620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nijhout H. F., Emlen D. J. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3685–3689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith L. D., Palmer A. R. Effects of manipulated diet on size and performance of brachyuran crab claws. Science. 1994 Apr 29;264(5159):710–712. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5159.710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Trinkaus E., Churchill S. E., Ruff C. B. Postcranial robusticity in Homo. II: Humeral bilateral asymmetry and bone plasticity. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994 Jan;93(1):1–34. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330930102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES