Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Jul 22;265(1403):1313–1318. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0435

Ultraviolet plumage ornamentation affects social mate choice and sperm competition in bluethroats (Aves: Luscinia s. svecica): a field experiment

A Johnsen, S Andersson, J rnborg, J T Lifjeld
PMCID: PMC1689210

Abstract

The blue throat feathers of male bluethroats (Luscinia s. svecica) show a reflectance peak in the ultraviolet (UV) waveband (320 to 400 nm). The throat is actively displayed during courtship, suggesting a role for sexual selection on an ultraviolet signal. Indeed, a recent aviary experiment demonstrated that females discriminated against males with artificially reduced UV reflectance (Andersson and Amundsen 1997). Here, we report the results of a similar experimental manipulation applied on free-ranging males. UV-reduced (UVR) males had a lower success in attracting mates, as judged from a significantly later start of egg laying, compared with control (C) males. UVR males also spent significantly less time advertising for additional mates when their own mate was fertile, and they had a lower success in achieving extra-pair fertilizations. Furthermore, UVR males tended to guard their mates more closely and lose more paternity in their own brood than C males did. We conclude that the treatment affected both social and extra-pair mate choice. This is the first experimental evidence that UV signalling influences male mating success in free-ranging birds.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (245.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C., Partridge J. C., Lunau K. Ultraviolet plumage colors predict mate preferences in starlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 5;94(16):8618–8621. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bennett A. T., Cuthill I. C. Ultraviolet vision in birds: what is its function? Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1471–1478. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90149-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Finger E., Burkhardt D. Biological aspects of bird colouration and avian colour vision including ultraviolet range. Vision Res. 1994 Jun;34(11):1509–1514. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90152-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jamieson A. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members. Anim Genet. 1994 Jun;25 (Suppl 1):37–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1994.tb00401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jeffreys A. J., Allen M. J., Hagelberg E., Sonnberg A. Identification of the skeletal remains of Josef Mengele by DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 1992 Sep;56(1):65–76. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(92)90148-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Rohde PA. Coloured leg bands affect male mate-guarding behaviour in the bluethroat. Anim Behav. 1997 Jul;54(1):121–130. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. Primmer C. R., Møller A. P., Ellegren H. New microsatellites from the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the swallow Hirundo rustica genomes. Hereditas. 1996;124(3):281–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1996.00281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Primmer C. R., Møller A. P., Ellegren H. Resolving genetic relationships with microsatellite markers: a parentage testing system for the swallow Hirundo rustica. Mol Ecol. 1995 Aug;4(4):493–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00243.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES