Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Sep 7;265(1406):1691–1696. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0490

Phylogenetic extinction rates and comparative methodology

P H Harvey, A Rambaut
PMCID: PMC1689345

Abstract

Species are not independent points for comparative analyses because closely related species share more evolutionary history and are therefore more similar to each other than distantly related species. The extent to which independent-contrast analysis reduces type I and type II statistical error in comparison with cross-species analysis depends on the relative branch lengths in the phylogenetic tree: as deeper branches get relatively long, cross-species analyses have more statistical type I and type II error. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed from extant species, under the assumptions of a branching process with speciation (branching) and extinction rates remaining constant through time, will have relatively longer deep branches as the extinction rate increases relative to the speciation rate. We compare the statistical performance of cross-species and independent-contrast analyses with varying relative extinction rates, and conclude that cross-species comparisons have unacceptable statistical performance, particularly when extinction rates are relatively high.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (155.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Nee S., Holmes E. C., May R. M., Harvey P. H. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Apr 29;344(1307):77–82. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nee S., May R. M., Harvey P. H. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 May 28;344(1309):305–311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pagel M. Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure. J Theor Biol. 1993 Sep 21;164(2):191–205. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1993.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Price T. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Apr 29;352(1352):519–529. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rambaut A., Grassly N. C., Nee S., Harvey P. H. Bi-De: an application for simulating phylogenetic processes. Comput Appl Biosci. 1996 Dec;12(6):469–471. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.6.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES