Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Oct 7;265(1408):1879–1894. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0516

Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata.

T Chapman 1, T Miyatake 1, H K Smith 1, L Partridge 1
PMCID: PMC1689375  PMID: 9802244

Abstract

Costs of reproduction include costs of producing eggs and of mating itself. In the present study, we made an experimental investigation of costs of reproduction in the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly, Ceratitis capitata). We demonstrated that virgins live longer than non-virgin females. However, in strong contrast to most findings within the Diptera, non-virginity had no detectable effect on egg production. Therefore the increased longevity of the virgin females cannot be attributed to an increase in egg production in non-virgin females, and instead indicates a cost of mating. A comparison of the life spans of normal females and those sterilized by low doses of X-irradiation, revealed an additional cost of egg production. There were no significant differences in remating levels between females that did and did not lay eggs, showing that the cost of producing eggs is independent of mating frequency. Medfly females therefore suffer a decrease in survival as a result of egg production and of mating, and these costs are independent of one another. To put our results into context, we reviewed the existing literature on the effects of mating on longevity, egg production and sexual receptivity for 64 species of Diptera, and examined the pattern of mating effects that emerged.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (274.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams T. S., Nelson D. R. Bioassay of crude extracts for the factor that prevents second matings in female musca domestica. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1968 Jan;61(1):112–116. doi: 10.1093/aesa/61.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adlakha V., Pillai M. K. Involvement of male accessory gland substance in the fertility of mosquitoes. J Insect Physiol. 1975 Aug;21(8):1453–1455. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(75)90207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BILEWICZ S. Doświadczenia nad wpływem czynności rozrodczych na długoś 1zycia u muchy owocowej Drosophila melanogaster. Folia Biol (Krakow) 1953;1(3):177–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumann H. Biological effects of paragonial substances PS-1 and PS-2, in females of Drosophila funebris. J Insect Physiol. 1974 Dec;20(12):2347–2362. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(74)90022-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baumann H. The isolation, partial characterization, and biosynthesis of the paragonial substances, PS-1 and PS-2 of Drosophila funebris. J Insect Physiol. 1974 Nov;20(11):2181–2194. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(74)90043-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnet B., Connolly K., Kearney M., Cook R. Effects of male paragonial gland secretion on sexual receptivity and courtship behaviour of female Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol. 1973 Dec;19(12):2421–2431. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(73)90245-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Carey J. R., Liedo P., Orozco D., Vaupel J. W. Slowing of mortality rates at older ages in large medfly cohorts. Science. 1992 Oct 16;258(5081):457–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1411540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Carey J. R., Liedo P. Sex mortality differentials and selective survival in large medfly cohorts: implications for human sex mortality differentials. Gerontologist. 1995 Oct;35(5):588–596. doi: 10.1093/geront/35.5.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chapman T., Liddle L. F., Kalb J. M., Wolfner M. F., Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):241–244. doi: 10.1038/373241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chapman T., Partridge L. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jun 22;263(1371):755–759. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen P. S., Stumm-Zollinger E., Aigaki T., Balmer J., Bienz M., Böhlen P. A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of female D. melanogaster. Cell. 1988 Jul 29;54(3):291–298. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(88)90192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cirera S., Aguadé M. The sex-peptide gene (Acp70A) is duplicated in Drosophila subobscura. Gene. 1998 Apr 14;210(2):247–254. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00069-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Craig G. B., Jr Mosquitoes: female monogamy induced by male accessory gland substance. Science. 1967 Jun 16;156(3781):1499–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.156.3781.1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dickinson J. M., Klowden M. J. Reduced transfer of male accessory gland proteins and monandry in female Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. J Vector Ecol. 1997 Jun;22(1):95–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fuchs M. S., Craig G. B., Jr, Hiss E. A. The biochemical basis of female monogamy in mosquitoes. I. Extraction of the active principle from Aedes aegypti. Life Sci. 1968 Aug 15;7(16):835–839. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(68)90114-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuchs M. S., Hiss E. A. The partial purification and separation of the protein components of matrone from Aedes aegypti. J Insect Physiol. 1970 May;16(5):931–939. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(70)90223-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuyama Y. Genetic evidence that ovulation reduces sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females. Behav Genet. 1995 Nov;25(6):581–587. doi: 10.1007/BF02327581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. GARCIA-BELLIDO A. DAS SEKRET DER PARAGONIEN ALS STIMULUS DER FEKUNDITAET BEI WEIBCHEN VON DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Z Naturforsch B. 1964 Jun;19:491–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gilbert D. G., Richmond R. C., Sheehan K. B. Studies of esterase 6 in Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Remating times of females inseminated by males having active or null alleles. Behav Genet. 1981 May;11(3):195–208. doi: 10.1007/BF01065458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Herndon L. A., Wolfner M. F. A Drosophila seminal fluid protein, Acp26Aa, stimulates egg laying in females for 1 day after mating. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Oct 24;92(22):10114–10118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hiss E. A., Fuchs M. S. The effect of matrone on oviposition in the mosquito, Aedes Aegypti. J Insect Physiol. 1972 Nov;18(11):2217–2227. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(72)90250-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Judson C. L. Feeding and oviposition behavior in the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.). I. Preliminary studies of physiological control mechanisms. Biol Bull. 1967 Oct;133(2):369–378. doi: 10.2307/1539832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kalb J. M., DiBenedetto A. J., Wolfner M. F. Probing the function of Drosophila melanogaster accessory glands by directed cell ablation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8093–8097. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Leahy M. G., Lowe M. L. Purification of the male factor increasing egg deposition in D. melanogaster. Life Sci. 1967 Jan 15;6(2):151–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Leopold R. A. Cytological and cytochemical studies on the ejaculatory duct and accessory secretion in Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol. 1970 Oct;16(10):1859–1872. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(70)90233-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Malick L. E., Kidwell J. F. The effect of mating status, sex and genotype on longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1966 Jul;54(1):203–209. doi: 10.1093/genetics/54.1.203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Manning A. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim Behav. 1967 Apr-Jul;15(2):239–250. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(67)90006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Merle J. Fonctionnement ovarien et réceptivité sexuelle de Drosophila melanogaster après implantation de fragments de l'appareil génital mâle. J Insect Physiol. 1968 Aug;14(8):1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(68)90055-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. O'Meara G. F., Evans D. C. Autogeny in saltmarsh mosquitoes induced by a substance from the male accessory gland. Nature. 1977 May 26;267(5609):342–344. doi: 10.1038/267342a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Riemann J. G., Moen D. J., Thorson B. J. Female monogamy and its control in houselfies. J Insect Physiol. 1967 Jan;13(3):407–418. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(67)90081-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Riemann J. G., Thorson B. J. Effect of male accessory material on oviposition and mating by female house flies. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1969 Jul;62(4):828–834. doi: 10.1093/aesa/62.4.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schmidt T., Choffat Y., Schneider M., Hunziker P., Fuyama Y., Kubli E. Drosophila suzukii contains a peptide homologous to the Drosophila melanogaster sex-peptide and functional in both species. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1993 Jul;23(5):571–579. doi: 10.1016/0965-1748(93)90030-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Tompkins L., Hall J. C. Identification of Brain Sites Controlling Female Receptivity in Mosaics of DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1983 Feb;103(2):179–195. doi: 10.1093/genetics/103.2.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wolfner M. F. Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 1997 Mar;27(3):179–192. doi: 10.1016/s0965-1748(96)00084-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES