Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1998 Nov 22;265(1411):2203. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0560

Energetic costs of size and sexual signalling in a wolf spider

J S Kotiaho, R V Alatalo, J Mappes, M G Nielsen, S Parri, A Rivero
PMCID: PMC1689511

Abstract

A prerequisite for honest handicaps is that there are significant condition-dependent costs in the expression of sexual traits. In the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata (Ohlert), sexual signalling (drumming) is costly in terms of increased mortality. Here we investigated whether this mortality may be caused by increased energy expenditure. During sexual signalling, metabolic rate was 22 times higher than at rest and four times higher than when males were actively moving. Metabolic rate per unit mass was positively related to absolute body mass during sexual signalling but not during other activities. This positive relationship is novel to any studies of metabolic rates. Indeed, it seems that the largest males can drum only 12 times per minute before reaching the maximum sustainable metabolic rate, whereas the smallest males may drum up to 39 times per minute. However, there is no relationship between body mass and drumming rate, indicating that larger males are able to compensate for the higher cost of drumming. There was a quadratic relationship between relative abdomen mass and overall body mass, which may provide a partial explanation for the increased energy expenditure of largest males while drumming. Altogether, our results indicate that sexual signalling is highly energetically demanding, which may be the main reason for the honesty of signalling in this species. In addition, the energetic costs are surprisingly strongly size dependent, which may compensate any disadvantage of small male size.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. F. Metabolic rates of spiders. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1970 Mar 1;33(1):51–72. doi: 10.1016/0010-406x(70)90483-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517–546. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grafen A. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):473–516. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zahavi A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol. 1977 Aug 7;67(3):603–605. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90061-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES