Abstract
Multiple cues contribute to the visual perception of an object's distance from the observer. The manner in which the nervous system combines these various cues is of considerable interest. Although it is accepted that image cues play a significant role in distance perception, controversy exists regarding the use of kinaesthetic information about the eyes' state of convergence. We used a perturbation technique to explore the contribution of vergence to visually based distance estimates as a function of both fixation distance and the availability of retinal information. Our results show that the nervous system increases the weighting given to vergence as (i) fixation distance becomes closer; and (ii) the available retinal image cues decrease. We also identified the presence of a strong contraction bias when distance cues were studied in isolation, but we argue that such biases do not suggest that vergence provides an ineffectual signal for near-space perception.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (193.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bingham G. P., Pagano C. C. The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Feb;24(1):145–168. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.1.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner E., van Damme W. J. Judging distance from ocular convergence. Vision Res. 1998 Feb;38(4):493–498. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00236-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Foley J. M. Binocular distance perception. Psychol Rev. 1980 Sep;87(5):411–434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gogel W. C. Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance. Am J Psychol. 1972 Dec;85(4):477–497. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. Psychol Rev. 1985 Apr;92(2):173–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnston E. B. Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Res. 1991;31(7-8):1351–1360. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90056-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Landy M. S., Maloney L. T., Johnston E. B., Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion. Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):389–412. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00176-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Massaro D. W. Ambiguity in perception and experimentation. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1988 Dec;117(4):417–421. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rogers B. J., Bradshaw M. F. Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces. Perception. 1995;24(2):155–179. doi: 10.1068/p240155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turvey M. T., Solomon J. Visually perceiving distance: a comment on Shebilske, Karmiohl, and Proffitt (1983). J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):449–454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young M. J., Landy M. S., Maloney L. T. A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Res. 1993 Dec;33(18):2685–2696. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90228-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]