Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Jan 22;266(1415):211–218. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0624

Visual cues to female physical attractiveness.

M J Tovée 1, D S Maisey 1, J L Emery 1, P L Cornelissen 1
PMCID: PMC1689653  PMID: 10097394

Abstract

Evolutionary psychology suggests that a woman's sexual attractiveness is based on cues of health and reproductive potential. In recent years, research has focused on the ratio of the width of the waist to the width of the hips (the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). A low WHR (i.e. a curvaceous body) is believed to correspond to the optimal fat distribution for high fertility, and so this shape should be highly attractive. In this paper we present evidence that weight scaled for height (the body mass index (BMI)) is the primary determinant of sexual attractiveness rather than WHR. BMI is also strongly linked to health and reproductive potential. Furthermore, we show how covariation of apparent BMI and WHR in previous studies led to the overestimation of the importance of WHR in the perception of female attractiveness. Finally, we show how visual cues, such as the perimeter-area ratio (PAR), can provide an accurate and reliable index of an individual's BMI and could be used by an observer to differentiate between potential partners.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (222.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bray G. A. Definition, measurement, and classification of the syndromes of obesity. Int J Obes. 1978;2(2):99–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown J. E. Preconceptional nutrition and reproductive outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 15;678:286–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frisch R. E. Fatness and fertility. Sci Am. 1988 Mar;258(3):88–95. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0388-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hartz A. J., Rupley D. C., Rimm A. A. The association of girth measurements with disease in 32,856 women. Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Jan;119(1):71–80. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaplan A. S. Biomedical variables in the eating disorders. Can J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;35(9):745–753. doi: 10.1177/070674379003500905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kowner R. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1996 Jun;22(3):662–675. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.3.662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lake J. K., Power C., Cole T. J. Women's reproductive health: the role of body mass index in early and adult life. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997 Jun;21(6):432–438. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manson J. E., Willett W. C., Stampfer M. J., Colditz G. A., Hunter D. J., Hankinson S. E., Hennekens C. H., Speizer F. E. Body weight and mortality among women. N Engl J Med. 1995 Sep 14;333(11):677–685. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199509143331101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marti B., Tuomilehto J., Salomaa V., Kartovaara L., Korhonen H. J., Pietinen P. Body fat distribution in the Finnish population: environmental determinants and predictive power for cardiovascular risk factor levels. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Jun;45(2):131–137. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.2.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reid R. L., Van Vugt D. A. Weight-related changes in reproduction function. Fertil Steril. 1987 Dec;48(6):905–913. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59581-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):293–307. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh D. Ideal female body shape: role of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Nov;16(3):283–288. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199411)16:3<283::aid-eat2260160309>3.0.co;2-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Singh D., Zambarano R. J. Offspring sex ratio in women with android body fat distribution. Hum Biol. 1997 Aug;69(4):545–556. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Swaddle J. P., Cuthill I. C. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 22;261(1360):111–116. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tovée M. J., Mason S. M., Emery J. L., McCluskey S. E., Cohen-Tovée E. M. Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses? Lancet. 1997 Nov 15;350(9089):1474–1475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64238-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tovée M. J., Reinhardt S., Emery J. L., Cornelissen P. L. Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):548–548. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)79257-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wickelgren I. Obesity: how big a problem? Science. 1998 May 29;280(5368):1364–1367. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5368.1364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Willett W. C., Manson J. E., Stampfer M. J., Colditz G. A., Rosner B., Speizer F. E., Hennekens C. H. Weight, weight change, and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the 'normal' weight range. JAMA. 1995 Feb 8;273(6):461–465. doi: 10.1001/jama.1995.03520300035033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zaadstra B. M., Seidell J. C., Van Noord P. A., te Velde E. R., Habbema J. D., Vrieswijk B., Karbaat J. Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ. 1993 Feb 20;306(6876):484–487. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES