Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Jan 22;266(1415):151. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0615

Specialists make faster decisions than generalists: experiments with aphids

E A Bernays, D J Funk
PMCID: PMC1689657

Abstract

Theoretical studies and a few recent experimental reports suggest that the evolution of diet breadth in herbivorous insects is constrained by a limited neural ability to efficiently process large amounts of information in short periods of time. This neural-constraints hypothesis predicts that generalist herbivores should make slower or poorer decisions than specialists when selecting plants, because generalists must discriminate and decide among stimuli from a wider variety of potential hosts. The present study compares the speed with which host-associated decisions are made in specialist versus generalist populations of the aphid Uroleucon ambrosiae. Populations of U. ambrosiae from eastern North America are highly specific to the host plant Ambrosia trifida (Asteraceae), whereas those from the American southwest also feed on a variety of other taxa from the Asteraceae. Experiments with winged (alate) and wingless (apterous) individuals showed that host-finding, host-selection, host-acceptance, host-sampling and host-settling were more efficiently performed by the eastern specialists. These very consistent results provide evidence that strongly supports the neural-constraints hypothesis.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (147.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Endler J. A. Frequency-dependent predation, crypsis and aposematic coloration. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1988 Jul 6;319(1196):505–523. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1988.0062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis A. C. Memory Constraints and Flower Choice in Pieris rapae. Science. 1986 May 16;232(4752):863–865. doi: 10.1126/science.232.4752.863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Martín B., Collar J. L., Tjallingii W. F., Fereres A. Intracellular ingestion and salivation by aphids may cause the acquisition and inoculation of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses. J Gen Virol. 1997 Oct;78(Pt 10):2701–2705. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-10-2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Maunsell J. H. The brain's visual world: representation of visual targets in cerebral cortex. Science. 1995 Nov 3;270(5237):764–769. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rausher M. D. Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science. 1978 Jun 2;200(4345):1071–1073. doi: 10.1126/science.200.4345.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Reid P. J., Shettleworth S. J. Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1992 Jul;18(3):273–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES